What gets me is news breaks that this woman is weighing committing a crime before Congress &it’s getting framed by the NYT as some Lifetime drama called “Hope’s Choice.”— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) May 26, 2019
This is a fmr admin official considering participating in a coverup led by the President.
Treat her equally. https://t.co/XcNbSuU4QB
Update: There was some reaction to this on Twitter:
"While Hicks admired Hegel, she had grave reservations about his bombastic promises. Her existentialist orientation initially led her instead to Kierkegaard, whose pseudonymous parody of Hegelianism she found appealing. But his thoughts on personal responsibility unsettled her."— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) May 27, 2019
This is not an existential question, @nytpolitics. If I were called to testify before Congress, I would not need to consult Sartre or Kierkegaard. I'd lawyer up and ask "what time." https://t.co/ZvdGbtqyRj— Tom Nichols (@RadioFreeTom) May 26, 2019
The next time a Black man decides not to comply with a subpoena, I want @nytimes to do a fucking glamour shot piece on him that highlights his existential angst https://t.co/m05Z3FQllE— Desiree Adaway (@desireeadaway) May 26, 2019
Subpoena is from Latin “sub” meaning “under” and “poena” meaning “you just decide what you want to do based on whatever you think will be most profitable in the long run.”— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) May 26, 2019
This isn’t really a dilemma. She should comply. https://t.co/r5jfakb61t— Liz Mair (@LizMair) May 26, 2019
For Hicks. an Annual Tradition pic.twitter.com/duxGF8VnQe— Eric Columbus (@EricColumbus) May 26, 2019
Hi we're the New York Times, if you're considering breaking the law we'd like to shoot your album cover like you're Sad Belinda Carlisle or something https://t.co/f6femhK7TG— Andy Cobb (@AndyCobb) May 26, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment