Showing posts with label magazines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label magazines. Show all posts

Monday, April 15, 2019

The Guessing Game - Updated

I'm on vacation and not paying too much attention to pop culture right now, so there won't be an official Guessing Game post this week. My best guess for the main cover story is Tiger Woods' big comeback at the Masters yesterday.

Another possibility is Melania Trump, who turns 49 on April 26. If People wanted to feature her on the cover, which they haven't done since the 2016 campaign, a story about her life as the first lady, the "challenges" that come with being married to Donald and how she stays "forever young" at 49, could happen this week. (Yes, that's snark. People has previously described two famous women, Jennifer Lopez and Julia Roberts, as staying forever young at age 49; read my thoughts about that here.)

I've pointed out here many times that People is ignoring Melania and I admit I continue to wonder why that's so. Given that the primary purpose of the cover story each week is to drive single-issue sales at grocery stores, airports and newsstands, do the editors just not think Melania's face on the cover would sell magazines? I would say she's just as intriguing, for better or worse, as Reba McEntire's new relationship, Joanna Gaines' 5th baby and Dax Shepard & Kristen Bell's marriage, all of which have been featured as the main cover story recently. Is it really a business decision or is there a political undertone as well? It's possible they've reached out to Mrs. Trump for an interview and been told no, but they could still run a "write-around" article with quotes from "friends," "sources" and "Melania insiders." I'm sure there are many, many sources out there who would be happy to dish about Donald's wife.

For what it's worth, unlike previous first ladies Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama, Melania also hasn't been featured on the cover of Vogue. In an interview with CNN, quoted by Jezebel, editor-in-chief Anna Wintour explains why not, not that Melania cares, you understand:

Melania Trump doesn’t even want to be on the cover of Vogue, even though former First Lady Michelle Obama appeared on its cover in 2009, 2013, and 2016. So the de facto ban on her appearing in the magazine doesn’t even matter to her. She is fine!

“To be on the cover of Vogue doesn’t define Mrs. Trump, she’s been there, done that long before she was first lady,” Trump’s spokesperson Stephanie Grisham told Fox News on Friday (Trump was on the cover in 2005, long before she was a first lady). “Her role as first lady of the United States and all that she does is much more important than some superficial photo shoot and cover.”

The statement is in response to Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour’s subtle diss during a recent interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, who asked how Vogue chooses what women to profile, why the magazine has chosen to cover more Democratic women than Republicans, and why Vogue put first ladies Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama on the cover.

“You have to stand up for what you believe in and you have to take a point of view,” Wintour said. “We profile women in the magazine that we believe in the stand that they’re taking on issues we support them, we feel that they are leaders.”

“If you’re talking about the first lady [Michelle Obama] or Senator [Kamala] Harris, obviously these are women that we feel are icons and inspiring to women from a global perspective,” she said. “I also feel even more strongly now that this is not a time to try—and I think one has to be fair, one has to look at all sides—but I don’t think it’s a moment not to take a stand.

“This just further demonstrates how biased the fashion magazine industry is, and shows how insecure and small-minded Anna Wintour really is,” Grisham said. “Unfortunately, Mrs. Trump is used to this kind of divisive behavior.”

Please continue to Be Best, Melania. (No link, this is the entire article.)

Here's Melania's Vogue cover, dated February, 2005, from a January 5, 2017 article at British newspaper/website The Telegraph:

Image result for Melania Trump Vogue cover 2005

The Telegraph article, published just a few days before Donald's inauguration, is interesting too: 

[W]hat can we learn about the so-far, so-quiet new First Lady from the accompanying (now-vintage) interview, and what might it tell us about the way that she is approaching shopping for the second most important dress she will wear in her life; her inauguration gown?

When it came to her wedding dress Melania actively sought Vogue’s advice. The Donald proposed in May 2004 with a 12 carat, $2 million Graff diamond, on the night of the Dangerous Liaisons Costume Institute Ball (also known as the MET Gala) which was co-sponsored by Vogue. The new Mrs Trump-to-be was also, as fate would have it, wearing an Atelier Versace couture dress inspired by Baz Luhrmann’s Moulin Rouge! that Donald had bought for her at a Vogue auction a few months before. In all the excitement, he had outbid himself from $27,000 to $30,000, just for the fun of it. So when Melania approached Anna Wintour and her team, she did so with some personal meaning.
(Read the entire Telegraph article here.)

Side note: One of the creepiest pictures ever of Donald, Melania and Ivanka was taken at the above referenced MET Gala: 

 Ivanka, Donald and Melania Trump at the Dangerous Liaisons Costume Institute Benefit in 2004.  
photo credit: REX

Will People put Melania on the cover this week? I'd say it's possible but unlikely. Stay tuned. I'll post a link to the new cover when it comes out later this week.

Update on Sunday evening, April 22. Here is the new cover, a few days late and featuring Lori Loughlin:

Issue dated April 29, 2019:  Lori Loughlin

Last year at this time: Issue dated April 30, 2018


I'm not doing a separate Guessing Game post this week; the new issue, dated May 6, should be the so-called Beautiful issue, a week later than last year. (Another possible cover story is the new royal baby, who is due any day now. Are People editors fervently praying that he or she doesn't show up until after the Beautiful issue is published? You bet they are.) Who will be the Beautiful cover girl this year? My only guess right now is Beyonce. If inspiration strikes with any other names, I'll update this post.

Thursday, August 23, 2018

Paying Karen - Updated

The covers of Men's Journal magazine usually look like this:


So why does the September, 2018 issue look like this:

Rachel Maddow has an idea:

In late July, the Wall Street Journal published a report detailing the ways in which American Media Inc., the Trump-connected company that owns the National Enquirer as well as Men’s Journal, is trying to spin an alleged “hush money” payout to McDougal into making it seem like it was a payment to appear on the cover of the men’s magazine.

McDougal’s Men’s Journal cover was published “despite what appeared to be total bewilderment by the magazine’s own staff,” Maddow said. The WSJ‘s July report included descriptions of high-ranking executives at the company urging AMI CEO David Pecker—a man who considers Trump to be a “good friend”— to reconsider the move, which he reportedly ordered.

“Nevertheless, there she is,” the host said.

...The existence of McDougal’s AMI cover, the host said, is a “somewhat hilarious step” to make it seem like the $150,000 contract really was a legitimate publishing move — even though Men’s Journal neither did any original photography for the story, nor did its reporters interview her.

See the story, from Maddow's August 10 program, here.

In other AMI/David Pecker news, he has been given immunity to tell the feds what he know about Michael Cohen, and by extension, Donald Trump:

The chairman of the company that publishes the National Enquirer was granted immunity by federal prosecutors as part of an investigation into President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, NBC News reported Thursday.

The immunity deal was earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal and Vanity Fair.

Details of the agreement were not immediately known. But the Journal reported earlier Thursday that American Media Inc. Chairman David Pecker had given prosecutors details about the president's knowledge of payments Cohen made to women alleging affairs with Trump. (From CNBC, read the story here.) 

From Talking Points Memo, here's Josh Marshall's take on that:

The latest news is that National Enquirer chief David Pecker also “flipped” and agreed to cooperate in the Cohen/Trump case. This was pretty clear in the Cohen Information document, though it was not stated explicitly. For what it’s worth, this seems like the least surprising thing in the world.

If you read the Cohen Information, which is essentially the charging document, it makes clear that the Trump/Enquirer arrangement wasn’t just a friend keeping an eye out for his friend – the way the relationship and modus operandi had been portrayed in the media. It was a very specific arrangement: The Enquirer would troll for Trump-damaging stories, which there were obviously going to be a lot of, buy them and then sell them to Trump. The last part is key; and we didn’t know that until Tuesday. This wasn’t just being a pal. It was a specific, standing financial arrangement. The Enquirer would essentially act as a cut-out, buying stories on Trump’s behalf without the seller of the story knowing what was happening.

It was a great convenience. It’s obviously inherently difficult [for] Trump to purchase stories about his affairs from former mistresses or sex partners. Obviously he did that too. But in many cases it was going to be easier for the Enquirer to trick the sellers by making them think they were selling their story to a publisher rather than Trump.

It’s one thing to do something like this as an individual. But the Enquirer was doing this as a company, with multiple employees involved. Given the various ancillary crimes involved and the potential for other crimes that remain uncharged, that’s a big problem and a real threat to the company.

I see zero reason why Pecker would not turn on Cohen and Trump more or less immediately. He’s a big time operator in his own right. He definitely does not need this crap. There is potentially real legal jeopardy for him and AMI Media. And he may have more information to share than we yet realize.

Finally, at least for now, author Brad Thor has some fun with words on Twitter:

Update: Thor's not the only one having fun on Twitter:


And one more thing:
Friday morning update: Brad Thor loses his bet (but it's still a fun headline.)


Friday, August 3, 2018

Editors Are Important - Updated


photo credit: Princess Eugenie/Instagram

There's a very sloppy paragraph in a People.com story about Princess Eugenie, and yes, I cut-and-pasted it exactly as is:

The hallway features aeveral stunning portraits line the walls, which are painted pale blue. The sun is streaming through the floor-to-ceiling windows, which light up the ornate end tables and trail of bust sculptures. And the photo also offers a rare glimpse of the lavish red palace carpet runs the length of the impressive corrider.

The first sentence should say "several stunning portraits lining the walls..." and the last sentence should say "... the lavish red palace carpet that runs the length of the impressive corridor." 

I'm also puzzling over the phrase "trail of bust sculptures" in the middle sentence. I don't see any obvious typos, but on the other hand I have no earthly idea what a trail of bust sculptures is. Yes I see the sculptures but are they really a trail? The whole paragraph is just weird.  

Read the story here.

Sunday night update: People frequently doesn't correct their typos but this time they did. This is what the paragraph looks like now:

The hallway features several stunning portraits lining the walls, which are painted pale blue. The sun is streaming through the floor-to-ceiling windows, which light up the ornate end tables and trail of bust sculptures. And the photo also offers a rare glimpse of the lavish red palace carpet that runs the length of the impressive corridor.

Tuesday, July 31, 2018

The Guessing Game - Updated

What will be on the cover of People this week? My guesses:

Demi Lovato: Hospitalized for an overdose. It happened a week ago, just past the Monday night deadline for last week's issue. There have been so many stories about this at people.com that I can't imagine what's left to write about, but it's a possibility
Karlie Kloss: The supermodel is engaged to Joshua Kushner, brother of Jared Kushner
Meghan: She turns 37 this Saturday
Thomas Markle: Around the time of the wedding I had some sympathy for Meghan's father, because it can't be easy to be in the center of a huge media story, but now he just looks pathetic and desperate
Duggar family: Another one is engaged
Les Moonves: The Chairman of CBS is accused of sexual misconduct
Carole Radziwill: Leaving Real Housewives of New York
Omarosa: Her book comes out Aug. 14; the publisher claims it is "explosive and jaw-dropping." If it really is it will be a big deal, but I assume she signed one or more NDAs during her association with Donald Trump, so how truthful can she be? 
Michelle Williams: A secret wedding
Nikki Bella: Cancels her wedding to John Cena, again
Mollie Tibbetts: Missing Attractive White Woman
Don Jr. and/or Kimberly Guilfoyle: Rumors that they're getting engaged as soon as his divorce is final
Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas: Engaged after a very short courtship, he's 11 years younger than she is
Nacho!: Would People feature our favorite Argentine polo player? They might. He certainly has cover boy looks and there are cute videos of him with Harry and Meghan
Alex Trebek: Thinking about retiring
Ivanka Trump: She's closing her business; apparently her father has "joked" that he could have had Tom Brady as a son-in-law, did Ivanka and Tom date at some point? (The Mooch says yes, read about it here.)
Grocery Joe, Jordan the obnoxious model, Colton the virgin, etc: Things got pretty wild on the Men Tell All show last night. If tradition holds, next week's cover will feature Becca and her new fiance as the main cover story, but I could see a sidebar story for these guys this week

Stories that appear on the cover of this week's issue will be highlighted in green.

Wednesday morning update: See the new cover, with Demi Lovato as the main story, here.

Thursday, June 21, 2018

Welcome To America - Updated


To quote photographer David Hume Kennerly, this one's probably not going up on the wall at Mar-a-Lago.

To be clear, Kennerly didn't take the original picture of the little girl. It was taken by John Moore, Special Correspondent/Senior Staff Photographer at Getty Images:

Public response to the photographs of this scared little girl from Honduras has been overwhelming for me to see. I thought I would share the images that led to the key moment that touched many of you, as it did me. A Honduran asylum seeker, age 2, cries as she and her mother are taken into custody by federal agents near the US-Mexico border. The mother said they had been traveling for a month to reach the United States. They had just crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico and were then transported to a US Customs and Border Protection processing center. The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy for undocumented immigrants calls for the frequent separation of parents and children while their cases for political asylum are adjudicated, a process that can take months - or years. This is a series of photographs I took while on a ride-along with the Border Patrol in Texas’ Río Grande Valley last week. #gettyimages #undocumented #gettyimagesnews
A post shared by John Moore (@jbmoorephoto) on

Thursday afternoon update: Next week's cover of the New Yorker: