Tuesday, February 28, 2017

The Guessing Game

What will be the cover story on the new issue of People magazine? My guesses:

Oscars: The big flub, possibly including Warren and Faye, the accountants, Jimmy Kimmel and/or the producers and stars of La La Land and Moonlight
Hoda Kotb: Adopts a baby
Savannah Guthrie: Back from maternity leave
Mama June: A new reality show featuring her big makeover
Lin-Manuel Miranda: More likely if he had won and joined the EGOT club
Bill Paxton: Dead Celebrity
Alexis Arquette: Not included in Oscar's In Memoriam segment
Corinne Olympios: She was eliminated in last night's episode; just before noon today, the three top headlines at people.com were:

  • The Bachelor's Corinne is Unapologetic as she moves on from Nick Viall: "I Love Myself" 
  • After the Fantasy Suites: Look back at Bachelor Villain Corinne's most outrageous moments (Note that this headline is misleading. Corinne was sent home after hometown dates, she never made it to the Fantasy Suite)
  • The Bachelor's Corinne will punch you in the face if you try to give her red roses again  

Monday, February 27, 2017

Blogging The Bach: "One (Hopefully) Good Love Story...

Wednesday noonish update: Mike Fleiss and Kaitlyn are still at it:




Tuesday morning update: Mike Fleiss fires back:





Looks like there's no love lost between Fleiss and Kaitlyn.

Original post:
... plus 100 times its weight in smoke and mirrors." I'm quoting from Sharleen Joynt's cool blog called All The Pretty Pandas. She frequently points out the "smoke and mirrors" in this show, also known as misleading editing, and this week I especially enjoyed her take on the scene in the Miami boutique. No, Corinne really didn't pay over $3,000 for Nick's clothes. You can read Sharleen's explanation here.

Did you notice that no one got sent home on Monday night's episode? (An historic first in Bachelor history, at least as far as I can remember.) The show stuck with its "To be continued" format, meaning the post-hometown dates rose ceremony is delayed until next week. We did see what should have been last week's rose ceremony, although it was distinctly casual, with Nick arriving at the ladies' hotel room and handing out roses while sitting on a couch. Then Nick set out to meet the parents. My response? Meh. Truth be told, I'm mostly over Nick and his season, although, yes, I am still watching.

Image result for waterside plaza new york
photo: nydailynews.com

Before I talk about the episode, let's talk about me, because two of this week's locations brought back memories of days gone by. When I was 20-something, I lived in New York City for a year, in an apartment located at E 25th Street and FDR Drive in Manhatten, overlooking the East River to Brooklyn. At the end of the show, when Corinne was on the balcony of her hotel room in Brooklyn, looking back at Manhatten, voila, there was my former home, shown above. When I was 30-something I lived in a small town in Arkansas called Blytheville. It's just down the road from Hoxie and while I don't have a specific memory of visiting Hoxie, it's possible that I did. Now, let's talk Bachelor...

I almost always find the Hometown Dates episode to be boring; certainly that was true this time. Raven's father is cancer-free, which is wonderful, Rachel's father the federal judge can't participate in a silly reality show, Corinne's father marinates his own olives and Vanessa's father isn't sold on this whole get-engaged-to-a-man-his-daughter-met-on-television. Done.

Except we're not done, because once again a rose ceremony was pushed off to the beginning of the next episode. Before we get to that, however, Nick will have some kind of conversation with his former girlfriend, Andi Dorfman. This has happened occasionally before. I remember someone flew all the way to New Zealand to "confront" Jason Mesnick, and someone else flew to Switzerland to surprise Ben Flajnik. In both cases the big reunions were a whole lot of nothing and I'm sure Andi's conversation with Nick will be no different. And don't forget this didn't just happen, it had to have been completely producer-driven. Otherwise, as I always ask, how would Andi have known where Nick was? Anyway, eventually, the three remaining women and Nick will pack their bags and head for Finland.

We'll probably only see one of the Fantasy Suites dates tonight (after the from-four-to-three rose ceremony) because tonight's episode is only an hour, followed by the two-hour premiere of a new ABC show called When We Rise. The other half of the episode will air next Monday, followed by the two-hour Women Tell All show.

I'm ready to move on to Rachel's historic turn as the first black Bachelorette. Rachel's hometown date with Nick was almost entirely focused on the fact that they are an interracial couple and I'm so hoping that's not the case for the entirety of her season. As I said last week I'm interested to see the casting, i.e., what's the percentage of black men and white men? I'm also curious about the professional accomplishments of her potential husbands. On JoJo's season, the final four contestants were a former pro quarterback (Jordan,) a former competitive swimmer (Robby,) a medical sales rep (Chase) and a war veteran (Luke.) Nothing wrong with any of that but Rachel's an attorney. If the contestants ABC chooses for her are mostly 20-somethings who haven't figured out what they want to be when they grow up, other than reality TV star and Instagram pitchman, Rachel may have to pretend to "connect" with most of them for the cameras a whole lot more than she really does.

Finally, for now, it looks like Nick will be dancing the night away on Dancing With The Stars, which apparently he's been fervently hoping to do. Previous Bachelors Jake, Sean and Chris also put on their dancing shoes, but last year Ben H didn't and I'd read that ABC no longer wanted Bach alums to go on the show, because it dilutes the Bach brand. On one level Kaitlyn's tweet below appears to confirm that, saying Exec Producer Mike Fleiss nixed her chance to dance, but on another level, ha ha ha. He doesn't want people wanting fame after his show? As I've alluded to before, fame after the show, whether it's on DWTS or Instagram, is pretty much the main reason for going on the show in the first place.

 @people why does a bachelorette never get this gig @BachelorABC?!? I wanted to see @kaitlynbristowe shake her tail feather!

It's almost time for episode 9, Rosebuds, then meet me back here soon, same Bach time, same Bach channel!

Sunday, February 26, 2017

A 13th EGOT? A 3rd PEGOT? Maybe

Monday afternoon update #2: I was right, the red envelope was part of the problem. From cnn.com:

A 2016 Los Angeles Times story detailed one such precaution: the envelopes themselves. The names of the categories are printed on the outside to prevent confusion and the text used is "large enough for a presenter and cameras to read easily," the piece noted.

It's worth noting, however, that this year's envelope design was changed from gold paper with white labels to red paper with gold lettering -- considerably harder to read in dim backstage lighting.

Monday afternoon update: Miranda didn't win, but if he had, his accomplishment would be overshadowed by the Best Picture screw-up. Thoughts:

Faye Dunaway, left, and Warren Beatty present the award for best picture, but the exterior on the envelope reads "Actress in a Leading Role."

It's a 3 1/2 to 4 hour live broadcast, with lots of moving parts and lots of fallible human beings. It's a wonder screw-ups don't happen more often.

The red envelope with gold letters is striking but I'm guessing next year it will be a white envelope with large black letters.

Warren Beatty clearly knew something was wrong. Why didn't he ask for help? Showing the card to Faye Dunaway sure wasn't the way to solve the problem.

The headline currently at cnn.com calls this an "historic Oscar blunder" and the story includes "how this went down" and a moment-by-moment forensic analysis, which strikes me as overkill. This really isn't the most important thing that ever happened.

Lin-Manuel Miranda is 37, he's got time. He'll get that EGOT eventually.

Another accomplishment being overshadowed by the screw-up belongs to Viola Davis. She is only the 23rd person to win the "Triple Crown of Acting" (an Oscar, a Tony and an Emmy) and the first African American women to do so.

Finally, as I've been known to say about stunts on The Bachelor, no way do I believe that "tourists on the bus" thing just happened. If nothing else, I'm pretty sure the participants would have had to sign legal releases before their faces could be shown on camera. The stunt was silly and it took too long, one of the reasons the show ran for more than 4 hours. Too much.

Original post:
If Lin-Manuel Miranda wins an Oscar tonight for Moana, he'll become the 13th member of the EGOT club - performers who have won an Emmy, Grammy, Oscar and Tony award. There are currently 12 "pure" EGOT members, who won all four awards in competitive categories:

Richard Rodgers
Helen Hayes
Rita Moreno
John Gielgud
Audrey Hepburn
Marvin Hamlisch
Jonathan Tunick
Mel Brooks
Mike Nichols
Whoopi Goldberg
Scott Rudin
Robert Lopez

Barbra Steisand, Liza Minelli, James Earl Jones, Alan Menken and Harry Belafonte are also EGOT members, but in each case, one of their awards was "non-competitive," for example, the Jean Herscholt Humanitarian (Oscar) Award for Belafonte, and a Star of the Decade Special Tony Award for Streisand. Regardless, very elite company indeed.

If Miranda wins tonight, he'll also become just the third member of an even more exclusive club, the "PEGOT," in which the P stands for Pulitzer. Who else is in this rarefied company? Marvin Hamlisch (for A Chorus Line) and Richard Rodgers (for South Pacific.)

Thursday, February 23, 2017

2024: Los Angeles Or Paris?

Budapest has withdrawn its bid for the 2024 Summer Olympics, leaving Los Angeles and Paris as the last two candidate cities. Los Angeles has hosted Summer Games twice before, in 1932 and 1984; Paris hosted the 1924 Summer Games. France has also hosted the Winter Games three times: in 1924 (Chamonix,) 1968 (Grenoble,) and 1992 (Albertville.) The U.S. also hosted the Summer Games in 1996 (Atlanta,) and the Winter Games four times: twice in Lake Placid, New York (1932 and 1980,) once in Squaw Valley, California (1960) and once in Salt Lake City (2002.)

Will the Olympics return to the U.S.? As I've said before, I think they will. Whether that's a good thing or not is debatable.

The 2024 host city will be announced by the IOC on September 13. You can keep track of everything related to Olympic bidding at a fun website called GamesBids.com

Days until the PyeongChang Games: 350

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Celebrity Divorce

Issue dated March 6, 2017: Christina El Moussa


No Guessing Game post this week, because People released the new cover one day early. Angie was on my list, along with Rob Kardashian (break-up with Blac Chyna,) Abby Wambaugh (engaged to Glennon Doyle Melton,) Lisa Marie Presley (a nasty divorce,) and the women from the Big Little Lies series on HBO.

The El Moussa divorce was featured once before, in a cover story on the December 26, 2016 issue:


As I went looking for the first El Moussa cover story, I realized I skipped posting a few issues at the first of the year. Here are the other ones I missed:

Issue dated January 2, 2017: Reese Witherspoon


Issue dated January 9, 2017: George Michael


Issue dated January 16, 2017: Debbie and Carrie


Issue dated January 24, 2017: Oprah (and Half Their Size)


Monday, February 20, 2017

Blogging The Bach: On To Hometowns

Greetings, Rosebuds! First, I have to confess: after seven episodes, I don't care very much about Nick or his season. I'm much more interested in the "Rachel is the new Bachelorette" story and how it plays out over the next few weeks and then during her season. Still, I do have a few thoughts:

Nick can't leave. In spite of all the dramatic emoting at the end of episode six and the beginning of episode seven, Nick can't just throw up his hands in despair and leave. That ridiculous storyline is an example of one of my biggest pet peeves about the show, i.e., it was totally scripted and completely fake.

How do I know? Because The Bachelor is big business, there's serious money at stake and Nick is an employee with a signed contract. He can't just walk away. Seriously. Think about it. Ask yourself this: What would happen if the lead walked out after filming 6 episodes? Answer: There would be no show. ABC would be running reruns of Dancing With The Stars on Monday nights and we'd all be watching The Apprentice. (And the quitter would be facing a serious lawsuit.) I can't imagine any circumstances, other than an actual tragedy like the death of the lead, under which they would stop filming and shut down production.

On a lighter note, we've already seen the previews of Nick in snowy Finland. That alone tells us he didn't bail in St. Thomas. As you can tell by my tone, this kind of invented (and very badly acted) drama is one of my least favorite things about the show.

No one-on-one for Corinne. For all the attention Corinne has gotten, she hasn't had a one-on-one date. More proof that she is being kept around for her entertainment value, not because Nick is seriously attracted to her.

And then there were four. After Nick sent Danielle M and Kristina home there were four women left, which is exactly the right number for Hometowns, so no need for a rose ceremony. (They may go through the motions and have one in tonight's episode but there's no suspense.) Corinne, Rachel, Raven and Vanessa will get hometown dates, as shown in this promo tweet from the show's official Twitter account:

As usual there will be a strange combination of local/authentic date-type activities, uncomfortable encounters with family members and lots of kissing. According to this advance peek, there will also be, what, swamp wrestling?


Whose idea was this? Not Nick or Raven, that's for sure. The Hometown Dates episodes always include some cringe-worthy moments but this has to be one of the worst. Yuk.

The new Bachelorette. It's been a week since the bombshell announcement and most of the reaction I've seen is positive, which is nice. There's been some fussing about the "spoiler," or in other words, why did ABC make the announcement a few weeks earlier than usual, thereby making it clear that Rachel is not, in fact, engaged to Nick? Here's how Chris Harrison explained it, while co-hosting Live With Kelly last week:

Traditionally, the next Bachelorette is announced after The Bachelor wraps, as the lead is usually one of the finalists. Last season, for example, ABC announced runner-up JoJo Fletcher during Ben Higgins' After the Final Rose post-finale special.

When speaking to Ripa, Harrison said the announcement came early due to a combination of show production schedules and the hope to be able to cast specifically for Lindsay.

"We named her the Bachelorette early because, weird TV calendar stuff is that The Bachelor runs right up to when we start taping The Bachelorette, we're talking days," he explained of the usual schedule. "We're done and then she goes further in the show and we're like, 'well we need to let everybody know that Rachel is our Bachelorette.'"

He added, "We would like to cast the show for her."  (From The Hollywood Reporter, read it here.) 

Unfortunately, I believe that "letting everybody know that Rachel is the Bachelorette," and "casting the show for her," translates to "we want to let the men applying to be on the show know that the Bach'ette is black, so the racist jerks can self-eliminate now." In a perfect world that detail wouldn't matter but we're not there yet.

With that in mind, I'm interested to see what the final cast looks like. Will it be mostly white guys with a few men of color, which is the traditional pattern? Will it be the reverse, with a mostly black cast with a few token white guys thrown in? Separate from that, age is also an issue. At 31, Rachel is older than previous Bachelorettes. Will the men be older too? I think that one of the reasons Nick's season feels so strange is the age gap between Nick at 36 and most of the women on his show, who are in their early to mid-twenties. Ideally Rachel's "husband candidate pool" will feature age-appropriate men, but I wouldn't count on it. My guess is that most men who are Rachel's "equal," not just age-wise but also in terms of their professional stature, may not be in a position to take six months off to be on The Bachelorette. (I don't mean to be sexist. What I'm saying applies to 30-something women too, which is why Nick's season didn't feature 25 professional women in their 30s.)

In one of her interviews, Rachel said the show approached her about possibly being the Bachelorette shortly after she was eliminated during filming last Fall. (Hometown dates were filmed Oct. 29 through Nov. 3, with the Fantasy Suites dates taking place the following week.) This is also a change from the usual pattern, and would appear to indicate that producers were looking at Rachel as a possible lead from the very beginning. Last week I wondered if the remaining episodes were being re-edited after the announcement, now I'm wondering if the entire season was edited to showcase Rachel in a particular way. For example, Reality Steve (yes, I've read some of his columns, no I won't post any more spoilers) says that Rachel and Vanessa had a big fight in Bimini, but absolutely none of it was shown last week. If you watched carefully you would have noticed that Vanessa was absent from almost the entire second half of the episode, with no explanation. I'm guessing that's not a coincidence.

Finally, how's everyone doing on Instagram?

Nick: 1 million
Corinne: 323,000
Rachel: 194,000
Raven: 251,000
Vanessa: 335,000

It's almost time for the Hometown Dates, meet me back here soon, Rosebuds, same Bach time, same Bach channel.

Fake News

Is Jennifer Aniston pregnant? Almost certainly not, but that didn't stop The Star magazine from publishing this cover story:

jennifer-aniston-pregnant-baby-bump-ivf-rumors-2

Star magazine, of course, is a tabloid, and one of the least credible ones out there. The New Yorker it isn't. On the other hand, it is an actual magazine, published every week and sold at supermarkets around the country. People here in America pay good money to read this stuff.

My point? It's not just in politics that some of my fellow citizens are susceptible to fake news.

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Only His Hairdresser Knows For Sure

170218-donald-trump-AP_17050015219177.jpg


















Is it just me or does the hair look different? Combed straight sideways, perhaps, without the characteristic over-the-forehead dip and swoop? And blonder?

For comparison, here's The Donald and his hair watching the Super Bowl two weeks ago:

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump attend a Super Bowl party at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Fla., Sunday, Feb. 5, 2017.

Friday, February 17, 2017

The Meatloaf Is Fabulous


Photo credit: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

What's our old friend Chris Christie been up to lately? Well, he and his wife had lunch with the president at the White House Tuesday. What did Christie have for lunch? Meatloaf. Why? Because POTUS told him too:

“This is what it's like to be with Trump," the governor of New Jersey recalled afterward. "He says, 'There's the menu, you guys order whatever you want.' And then he says, 'Chris, you and I are going to have the meatloaf. … I'm telling you, the meatloaf is fabulous.’”

When Christie told that story on a sports talk radio show yesterday, the host was incredulous: “It’s emasculating. Another man tells you what you’re eating and you eat it? Not acceptable! I don’t care who it is.”

“No, it’s not,” Christie replied sheepishly. “It is the president. … And the meatloaf is good.” (From the Daily 202 at the Washington Post. Read it here.)

It really can't be fun being Chris Christie these days. 

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Duggars

Issue dated February 27, 2017: Another Duggar Baby


Another Duggar baby story, ick. Blog readers know that I don't share People's fascination with the Duggars, although obviously a lot of people do. Clearly these covers sell well or People wouldn't keep posting them. The Duggar baby, Jamie Lynn Spears' daughter and Amal's twins were all on my guessing game list, *last week.* Rachel was on this week's list (along with a second mention of Amal) and I really thought she would be the main story. People is very supportive of the Bachelor franchise and as the first African-American lead Rachel is big news. It's disappointing (and depressing) to me that a Duggar baby is considered to be a more marketable story.

There will be a big Bachelor cover soon, however, featuring Nick and his new fiancee, unless they get bumped by a breaking news story. If my calculations are correct, Nick's finale airs March 13, and People's pattern is to feature the newly engaged couple as the main story on the issue that comes out the same week.

Insta Update

Newflash: Nick V now has 1 million Instagram followers! How long before he starts posting ads for protein powder, adult beverages and men's clothing? I'm assuming that as long as he's under contract with ABC and the producers, which lasts for some number of months after his finale airs, he's restricted as to what he can post on social media. But once he's "free," watch out, there's money to be made! As I said in an earlier post, I'm convinced that gaining enough Instagram followers to make money posting #ads is now the main reason for going on the show.

How are the final four women doing? Here are the numbers as of this morning:

Vanessa: 310,000
Rachel: 162,000
Raven: 223,000
Corinne: 289,000

Word Of The Day: Nincompoop

"Nincompoop: fool, simpleton." (From my trusty Merriam-Webster dictionary)

"Nincompoop" isn't a word you hear very often when discussing or reading about serious national issues. I would think it's used mostly by six-year-olds throwing shade on other six-year-olds. As best as I can recall I've only heard it used to describe an important or famous adult twice. Once was from Peggy Noonan, discussing Sarah Palin, which I (gleefully) wrote about here.

The second time was this morning, in an article titled "This Is What Incompetence Looks Like," at The Washington Post. Who was the author referring to? The current President of the United States:

While Trump’s top advisers go on television and describe him as a kind of living god with infallible judgment and superhuman accomplishments (“We have a president who has done more in three weeks than most presidents have done in an entire administration,” said [Stephen] Miller on Sunday), those a level or two below are rushing to the media to warn that their boss is a complete nincompoop. (Read the article here.) 

The article was posted Monday, prior to Micheal Flynn's "resignation," and events are only more chaotic as I'm writing on Wednesday morning. It looks like things are spiraling out of control at the Trump White House and there's no way yet to know how this all ends. I'll keep watching. 

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

The Guessing Game

I'm back in guessing game mode, at least for a while. Who will be on the cover of People magazine this week? My guesses:

Rachel Lindsay: The new Bachelorette and the first African-American lead in the history of the show
Melania and Ivanka: Melania did her first offical engagement as First Lady, hosting the wife of the Japanese Prime Minister; Ivanka's brand was in the spotlight when Kellyanne Conway shilled for it on Fox News. I know they'll turn up on the cover eventually.
Kellyanne Conway: Last week I said she was "The face of the Trump administration with a troubling disregard for the truth." It's still true.
Caroline Kennedy: Back in the U.S. after three years as the U.S. Ambassador to Japan. There's talk she may run for office. I'd love to hear her perspective on Prime Minister Abe's visit with the president.
Review of The Grammys: Especially Adele and/or Beyonce
Preview of The Oscars: Especially Emma Stone, who is the frontrunner for Best Actress, and Meryl Streep, who has been trolling Trump. (I wrote about it here)
Amal Clooney: News of her pregnancy broke just as People went to press last week.
Princess Diana: 2017 is the 20th anniversary of the accident in Paris. People is producing a documentary and I'm sure there will be many retrospectives and much commemorative coverage as we get closer to August.
Jennifer Aniston: Photographed in a bikini at age 48
PewDiePie: I don't even know who this is, really, but Disney dropped him

The Question

Update: I just saw a tweet referring to "Kremlingate." It's starting.

Original post:
"What did the president know and when did he know it?" This question was originally asked by Senator Howard Baker, the leading Republican on the committee investigating President Nixon and the Watergate scandal, in June, 1973.

Since that time, whenever you hear the "what did he know and when did he know it" question in regards to a politician facing a potential scandal, you can assume that politician has some trouble coming.

Today the question is being asked repeatedly about the current president and his now-former National Security Adviser's contacts with Russia.

Trump has been in office for 25 days.

Monday, February 13, 2017

Still Thinking About Rachel

Tuesday morning update: It's official, Rachel is the new Bachelorette. Nick put a gracious comment on his Instagram, acknowledging this early announcement was a bit of a spoiler for the end of his season: 


  • Bachelor Nation doesn't know how it all goes down yet, but as you'll surely see saying goodbye to Rachel was one of the most heartbreaking moments of my life. 
    I have met very few people who possess as much beauty, grace, and charisma as Rachel and after hearing that she'll be the next Bachelorette I couldn't be more excited.

  • Bachelor Nation is so lucky to have her but not as lucky as the group of men who will have a chance at winning her heart. No one is better prepared to show Bachelor Nation, and the world, the beauty of embracing diversity. Good luck Rachel, not that you'll be needing it. I'm so proud and happy for you, I'm honored to be able to call you a friend. I can't wait to watch your journey!! 

    • Note that this post got more than 10,600 comments.

    • Rachel commented on her Instagram too: 
    • So happy for this moment!!! Thank you so much for the love and support!!!! Can't believe I am the new bachelorette...still feel like I'm dreaming 
    • I checked Rachel's Instagram yesterday afternoon, just at the news started to come out, and she had 64,400 followers. At 9.00 Tuesday morning? 111,000.
    • (I'm not sure why the line spacing and font size is a little out-of-whack in this post. This is the first time I've copied/pasted text from Instagram and I'm having trouble getting it to line up right.) 
    • Original post:
Warning: spoiler ahead

It looks like it's really happening. ABC has cast its first African-American lead, naming Rachel Lindsay as the new Bachelorette. The franchise has taken some heat over the years for its lack of diversity and it's way past time for a change. Most seasons had a few men or women of color but none of them made it to the final four, which is almost always the pool of candidates from which ABC selects the next lead.

(Here's the spoiler:) Word on the street in Bachelor Nation is that Rachel comes in third on the current show, being sent home at the end of the Fantasy Suites episode. Given that Ben H, Kaitlyn, Chris Soules, Andi, Sean Lowe and Ashley Hebert all came in third on the season where they were contestants, it's been a pretty good bet all along that Rachel would get the job, except for one tiny detail: She's black. She's also savvy, charming, level-headed, whip-smart and gorgeous. And an attorney. (And her father's a federal judge. Really hoping we get to meet him during Rachel's hometown date.)

Yes, it will be weird to watch the next three episodes, knowing what we now know. I'm even wondering if editors are frantically re-editing the show as I type, for less of a focus on Nick and Rachel together and less talk from Rachel about how she can see herself with Nick. And yes, Rachel's fantasy suite date, in particular, may feel strange.

If ABC hadn't selected Rachel, it would be hard to frame it as anything other than a racial issue. (Or really, a "we're afraid we'll lose viewers if we cast a black lead" issue.) For the record, I'm cheering. I think Rachel will be a badass Bachelorette. (And I mean that in a good way.) I certainly didn't want to see Corinne in the role. She belongs on Bachelor In Paradise and I'm glad to see ABC doing the right thing. Go Rachel!

If It's Monday...

... it must be The Bachelor. Apparently there's some kind of announcement coming:










I have no idea what the big announcement could be. To pass the time until the big reveal, how about this GIF of Nick pretending to be a dinosaur:
Monday afternoon update: When I wrote this post this morning, one possibility that occured to me was that ABC would be announcing Rachel as the first African-American Bachelorette. I dismissed that thought because I assumed they wouldn't make that announcement while Rachel is still on the show, thereby spoiling at least part of the ending. (If Rachel is the Bach'ette she obviously isn't engaged to Nick.) Turns out my instincts were right. The Hollywood Reporter, Jezebel and some other sites are all reporting that Rachel has in fact been selected as the next Bach'ette and it will be announced on Jimmy Kimmel tonight.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

No Challenge Is To Great

Monday morning update: The print is no longer available at the Library of Congress shop.

Original post:
Would you pay $16.95 for a "Donald Trump Inauguration Print," complete with an inspirational saying and a picture of the 45th President of the United States?

From the Library of Congress online shop:

Image result for trump print library of congress
photo credit: Little Green Footballs

Printed in the USA, this print captures the essence of Donald Trump's campaign for the presidency of the United States.

8" x 10".

Buy it here, and no, you don't get a discount for the typo. (It should be "no challenge is too great.")

From Betsy Devos's Department Of Education

In honor of Black History Month, the Department of Education sent out this tweet:


What's wrong with it? The gentleman they're quoting is W.E.B. DuBois. Oops. Someone sent out a correction, but that one had a problem too. They were trying to say "apologies," not "apologizes:" 



That tweet's been deleted from the @usedgov Twitter feed, and as shown below, they finally got it right.

Everyone makes mistakes, everyone is occasionally subject to "autocorrect" problems, it's not the end of the world. Unfortunately, this isn't the first time DeVos, or someone who works for her, has had a problem with accuracy, grammar and/or spelling. (You know, the things they teach in schools...) On inauguration day, then-unconfirmed Secretary of Education DeVos sent out a tweet, on her personal account, that said "Honored to witness the historical Inauguration and swearing-in ceremony for the 45th President of the United States!"

The meanies on Twitter immediately pointed out that what DeVos meant to say was the "historic" inauguration. (Historical refers to past events, historic refers to something that is a big deal.) Seriously obsessed nitpickers pointed out that there were actually several problems with DeVos's tweet:

Once the original tweet was corrected, DeVos sent out this:

See, it was the staff's fault.

And The Oscar Goes To...

Sunday afternoon update: In an emotional speech last night, at a fundraiser for the Human Rights Campaign, Streep went after Trump again. Read about it here. No Trump tweet-response yet, but there's time. And if you're wondering, Oscar voting starts tomorrow and runs through February 21.

Original post:
Will Emma Stone win the Oscar for Best Actress? Probably. Based on what I'm reading, she's the favorite. Will Meryl Streep win her 4th Oscar, for her performance in Florence Foster Jenkins? Probably not, but I think it's possible.

First, some history. Did you know that Julie Andrews won a Best Actress Oscar for Mary Poppins, in 1966? She did and there's a fascinating backstory. Mary Poppins is a delightful movie and Andrews is delightful in it, but no one would argue that it was the kind of complex and nuanced performance that usually wins an Oscar. So why did Julie win? Conventional wisdom is that her Hollywood colleagues were supporting her by sending a "F**k You" message to Jack Warner, the producer who refused to cast Andrews in the film version of My Fair Lady.

In the early 1960s, Andrews was a Tony-nominated Broadway star, having appeared in The Boyfriend, Camelot, and as the original Eliza Doolittle in My Fair Lady. She was not, at that point, a movie star and Warner wanted a star. So he cast Audrey Hepburn. Walt Disney cast Andrews as Mary Poppins and the rest, as the saying goes, is history. My Fair Lady was nominated for 12 Oscars and won eight, including Best Picture and Best Actor for Rex Harrison. Audrey Hepburn wasn't even nominated for her star turn as Eliza.

What does all this have to do with Meryl Streep? I haven't seen Florence Foster Jenkins, but my perception is that it's not the kind of complex and nuanced role that usually wins Oscars, especially for Meryl Streep. So why do I think she might win? Because of this:










One of the most over-rated actresses in Hollywood? A Hillary flunky? I think there's a pretty good chance Streep's Hollywood colleagues might be in the mood to send a great big "F**k You" to the 45th president. We'll know two weeks from tonight.

Friday, February 10, 2017

This Day In History, 2007: Obama's Running


I miss him.

Thursday, February 9, 2017

365 Days To Go

The 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea formally open one year from today. Unlike the two previous games, 2014 in Sochi and 2016 in Rio, preparations appear to be proceeding right on schedule. I haven't seen any stories about corruption, construction delays, contagious diseases, polluted water, toilets that won't flush, etc. The Koreans have got this. Check out the official website here.

These will be the first of three Olympiads in Asia, in 2018, 2020 and 2022. The 2024 Summer Games will be in North America (Los Angeles) or Europe (Paris or Budapest.) The 2024 host city will be announced in September.

Survivor



I was pretty dismissive of Survivor a few posts ago so I thought I'd share this tweet, as balance, so to speak. According to TV Insider, the show returns March 8 for its 34th season, and that will be its 500th episode. How many of those episodes have I watched? Zero. You can read it here.

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Blogging The Bach: And Then There Were Six

The Bachelor: Nick holds a rose ahead of the rose ceremony on episode 6.

Another weird episode of The Bachelor. It started where we left off last week, with "Taylor returns to confront Nick," which added absolutely nothing to the show, and ate up time that could have been used later in the episode. (Show us why the volleyball date was such a disaster, show us who got the group date rose...) Contestants have "come back" after being eliminated before, in one fashion or another and it never works out well for them. In this instance it was almost certainly producer-driven. How else would Taylor have known where Nick and Corinne were, and how would she have gotten there? She sure didn't walk there all the way from the swamp, oops sorry, I meant the Bayou. Other thoughts:

We saw Corinne in this episode but it wasn't totally The Corinne Show, as the past couple of episodes have seemed to be. I loved this, from Raven: "I'm sure Corinne would be an amazing volleyball player if she wasn't drunk," but having said that, the heavy drinking really isn't attractive or funny. (When Ellen asked her about it, Corinne said she wasn't drinking to black-out level. Great.) It's hard to know what's really going on with Corinne. Is she really a mean girl? A bitch? Too young/immature/stupid to know how she's coming across? Is she playing a long game, to get famous, make money and possibly be The Bachelorette? No way to know for sure and probably all of the above to one degree or another, but I also think that a lot of her obnoxious behavior, and certainly a lot of the middle-of-the-day sleeping, was a result of drinking.

What really happened on the group date? Why did the women hate the game so much and why were they crying? Presumably there was a lot to the story that got left on the editing room floor, and word on the street in Bachelor Nation is that the game was a competition and the losing team (Danielle M, Vanessa and Jasmine) was supposed to go back to the hotel. The "losers" cried so much that Nick relented and kept them on the date, which in turn upset the winning team. This is pretty standard Bachelor stuff, so why not show it this time? What we did see was such a mishmash that it didn't make any sense.

(IMAGEL GIPHY)

Nick was in Take No Prisoners mode on the St. Thomas dates, sending Jasmine home from the group date then both Whitney and Danielle L from the two-on-one. I feel sympathy for Jasmine, it can't be easy to have to watch all the other women getting dates and time with Nick, but still. Jasmine, Jasmine, Jasmine, you really can't choke The Bachelor. I've said before that being The Bachelor means having to date and pretend to like women that you don't really care about, because otherwise there's no show, and Nick is really bad at it. Just watch his face, with Jasmine, with Whitney, even with Danielle L., who he had a "connection" with earlier in the process. In all three cases, his face tells the story - Nick is over it and those girls are out of here.

The two-on-one date struck me as both strange and unnecessary. One two-on-one date is now traditional and every season has one, but I don't ever remember a second two-on-one. As Danielle L pointed out, there wasn't any conflict between herself and Whitney, and producers could just as easily given either of them a one-on-one date followed by a regular rose ceremony, with the same end result  - both going home roseless. This date reminded me of the Ashley I/Kelsey date in Chris's season. In both cases, the Bach and two women were transported to a remote location where a completely out-of-place bedish couchy thing had been placed. Clearly there was nothing planned for either date except having the women sit there waiting to be told their fate. Two years ago Ashley and Kelsey both got left in the Badlands, this time Whitney was left on the beach (memories of Olivia) while Nick and Danielle escaped in the helicopter. Nick hadn't actually given Danielle the rose, however, and her reprieve was only temporary. Later that evening Danielle was gone too, for a total of six women eliminated in one episode. (Three at the end of the New Orleans date and three in St. Thomas.)

Good Morning, America had another Bach segment Tuesday morning but it wasn't a former Bach'ette this time. Nick himself was on the show with not one, not two but three former Bachelors, Andrew Firestone, Jason Mesnick and Ben Higgins. Andrew is now married to a woman he didn't meet on the show and they have three kids. Jason famously dumped fiancee Melissa and took up with runner-up Molly, to whom he is still married. And Ben is officially still with Lauren, notwithstanding rumors in Bachelor Nation that they've actually parted ways.

If you've ever wondered how much stuff these women actually pack to be on the show, or how much money they spend, Eonline has a fun article with some fun details. For the women, in particular, going on this show isn't something you just do. It takes preparation. Read the article here.

We're down to six contestants, one of whom is probably engaged to Nick and one of whom will probably be the next Bachelorette. The show almost always picks the person who comes in second, third or fourth to be the star of the next show. They broke the pattern with Nick, however, and it could happen again. Ashley I? Caila? Amanda S? We'll see.

Finally, how's everyone doing on Instagram? As of Wednesday afternoon:

Nick 972,000
Vanessa 257,000
Corinne 246,000
Danielle M 101,000
Kristina 94,300
Raven 166,000
Rachel 56,900

Meet me back here next week, Rosebuds, same Bach time, same Bach channel.

Chrissy Metz

Thursday afternoon update: People.com posted another story this morning with more information about Metz's weight, specifically the 100-pound loss referred to below:

Six years later, Metz says she’s kept off most of the weight (though she declines to reveal her current weight) and was bolstered along the way by another revelation on the set of her first significant role after the panic attack.

Clearly I made an inaccurate assumption when I said that she had gained all the weight back, and I apologize.

Update: In my "Fun with POTUS" post I had some fun snarking about the pathetically un-proofread and stupidly sloppy "Underreported" list the White House issued yesterday. (And for the record, they misspelled Denmark too.) In the interest of balance I'll point out that Chrissy's People story isn't very well edited either:

The role also lead her to This Is Us. Baring her body and stepping on a scale within the first few minutes of the show’s pilot this past September, Metz — through her character — Kate instantly instantly became a fan-favorite.

The dashes are misplaced and the word "instantly" is repeated. Really, People, as I've implored you before, hire some editors.

On a more serious note, having read the entire story, I'm both puzzled and slightly pissed off by the following:

She set about overhauling herself physically and emotionally, including following doctor’s orders to lose weight. “I was so gung ho, I lost 100 lbs. in less than five months,” she says. “All I did was eat a 2,000-calorie diet and walk 20 minutes a day.”

As the numbers on the scale fell, Metz regained confidence. Then she landed the recurring part on American Horror Story: Freak Show that would kick-start her career. 

Playing a “fat lady” meant stepping into a fat suit. “It was sobering,” she says. “I thought, ‘What if I become that heavy and can’t walk around or get stuck in the doorframe? I was like, ‘I don’t want this for me.’ ” 

The role also lead her to This Is Us. Baring her body and stepping on a scale within the first few minutes of the show’s pilot this past September, Metz — through her character — Kate instantly instantly became a fan-favorite.

Why puzzled? Because the story, as written, doesn't make sense. (And note, I copied these words verbatim.) She "overhauled" herself and lost 100 pounds, getting so thin that she had to wear a fat suit to play a fat lady on Freak Show. Sounds great. But then she gets the role on This Is Us, where she's apparently now back to being heavy enough to play an overweight woman without a fat suit. Obviously she gained the weight back, but the story doesn't address it, which is confusing.

Why pissed off? She claims to have lost 100 pounds in less than five months, eating 2,000 calories and walking 20 minutes a day. Really? Really? That sounds like an infomercial for a miracle diet pill to me. It's possible that 2,000 calories and 20 minutes of walking a day resulted in a 100-pound loss in less than five months, but for the record I don't think so. Everything I've ever read and heard about weight loss tells me that it just doesn't work that way. Furthermore, if she really did pull off that kind of weight loss in that short amount of time, it almost certainly wasn't healthy and it obviously wasn't sustainable because she's clearly gained it all back.

To be clear, I admire Metz. "Overweight actress" is almost a contradiction in terms in Hollywood, and yet she's putting herself out there for the whole world to see. She's starring in a hit show and talking honestly about sensitive issues. She probably is inspiring women to be body positive and accept themselves at any size, which is why the "lost 100 pounds in five months" part strikes me as a bad note in an otherwise great story.

Original post:
Issued dated February 20, 2017: Chrissy Metz



Chrissy Metz, a cover story I didn't see coming, in fact I really thought it would be Beyonce and her babies. She's there, in a tiny topline story, along with Meghan (and Harry, of course,) and Christie Brinkley. Tamron Hall's been in the news lately too, although I didn't think of her when I did my guessing game story. I'm very happy to see there's no coverage of the newest Duggar baby. Does that make me a bad person?

Still no sign of Melania et al, but I'm almost certain People is working on some kind of Trump cover story. They pretty much have to be, right?

Tuesday, February 7, 2017

The Guessing Game

Thursday afternoon update: Since I wrote this post it's been confirmed that Amal Clooney is indeed in the family way, with twins no less and due in June.

Original post:
For the first time in a while, I'm pondering what might be the cover story on the new issue of People. My best guess is the newly-enceinte Beyonce, which is actually one of those things I don't care about, but based on the fuss Bey's announcement stirred up, lots of other people do.

Other possibilities, in no particular order:

Tom Brady and Giselle: Most exciting Super Bowl ever
Corinne Olympios: Causing trouble on The Bachelor
Jamie Lynn Spears: Her daughter's ATV accident
Melissa McCarthy: Sends up presidential press secretary Sean Spicer
Kellyanne Conway: The face of the Trump administration, with a troubling disregard for the truth
Amal Clooney: There are rumors that she's pregnant but I haven't seen an official announcement
Meghan Markle: Prince Harry's girlfriend, wearing a bracelet that either is or is not in the shape of an H
Duggars: One of the daughters had another baby
Christie Brinkley: In Sports Illustrated, in a bikini, at age 63
The Obamas: Their new life, and that cool Richard Branson video
The Trumps: Specifically the Trump women, Melania, Ivanka, Tiffany, Ivana and Marla, or some combination thereof. In particular I assume that Melania and or Ivanka will show up on the cover before too long.

Fun With POTUS

No, not that POTUS, the former one. Check out this video from Richard Branson:



Looks like our newest ex-POTUS is having a lot more fun than the current one. Did you see this picture of the Trumps "enjoying" the Super Bowl? Yikes.

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump attend a Super Bowl party at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Fla., Sunday, Feb. 5, 2017.

And one more thing, Mr. (current) POTUS: The word "attacker" is not spelled like this: ATTAKER, and "San Bernardino" is not spelled like this: SAN BERNADINO

#EditorsAreImportant

Monday, February 6, 2017

This Day In History, 1952: The King Is Dead, Long Live The Queen




On February 6, 1952, King George VI died at the relatively young age of 56. At the moment his heart stopped beating, his elder daughter, then known as Princess Elizabeth, became Queen Elizabeth II. Today she celebrates her Sapphire anniversary, designating 65 years on the throne.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Yes, He Really Wants It To Look That Way



I'm obsessed with the hair, which is particularly orange and unnaturally swirly in the photo above. Specifically, I'm obsessed with wondering how a man who cares so much about how other things and people look, can allow himself to go out in public with that hair.

Is Trump really that obsessed with appearances? Yes, oh yes. New political website Axios has a story titled "Trump 101: The Producer Of His Own Epic Film," and it would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic. You can read it here, this is the good part:

His obsession with optics, style and TV glam are central to his being. Here are some gems we picked up reporting this:


  • Trump judges men's appearances as much as women's. A source who's worked with Trump explains: "If you're going to be a public person for him, whether it's a lawyer or representing him in meetings, then you need to have a certain look. That look —at least for any male — you have to be sharply dressed. Preferably, I would say, solid colors. … You should have a good physical demeanor, good stature, hair well groomed."
  • Trump pays close attention to ties. Says a source who has worked with Trump: "You're always supposed to wear a tie. If it's not a Trump tie, you can get away with Brooks Brothers. But I'd suggest Armani." Trump prefers wider, traditional ties, this source says. Regarding Trump's rakish policy adviser Stephen Miller, the source adds: "I've always been surprised about how Stephen Miller survives with those thin ties."
  • Trump likes the women who work for him "to dress like women," says a source who worked on Trump's campaign. "Even if you're in jeans, you need to look neat and orderly." We hear that women who worked in Trump's campaign field offices — folks who spend more time knocking on doors than attending glitzy events — felt pressure to wear dresses to impress Trump.
  • Staff knew Trump would be hacked off at press secretary Sean Spicer for not dressing fancy enough for his first briefing-room appearance. "It'd be one thing to wear a pinstripe that fit him perfectly," said one person who has spent a lot of time with Trump. "But, it was like, he had a gap in his collar. I was like, 'Oh God, he's going to get reamed.'"

    • "I was getting text messages: Can you believe what he's wearing?" the person continued. "Four people texted me, because we know the boss. … Trump is very much about: Present yourself in the best light. If you're going to represent him, even more so." Spicer seems to have learnt his lesson. Since then, he's only appeared in well-tailored dark suits, coupled with perfectly knotted ties.

Seriously?

Friday morning update: We may never know if this is all a publicity stunt or not, but our president had nothing better to do this morning than send out this tweet:

So far, no response from Arnold. About Trump's tweeting, in an earlier post I wondered if there was any significance to which tweets are sent using his personal account (realDonaldTrump) and those that come out from the official presidential account (POTUS,) and we may have an answer. I read that the POTUS account is managed by staff, so the tweets are not really from him. Tweets from @realDonaldTrump are typed by his own little hands.

Thursday afternoon update: One more thing about Trump and The Apprentice. He's still an executive producer of the show, meaning prayers for higher ratings are really prayers for higher revenue for Donald Trump. His remarks are getting a lot of coverage and as shown below, Arnold weighed in almost immediately, which led to more coverage about their "feud." Wow, all of a sudden everyone is talking about The Apprentice, so much so that I actually wondered if this is all a publicity stunt cooked up by The Donald and The Arnold. It's not out of the question but I want to believe that after being married to Maria Shriver, son-in-law to Eunice Kennedy Shriver and brother-in-law to Tim Shriver, all of whom are devout Catholics, perhaps Arnold wouldn't be comfortable staging a publicity stunt at the National Prayer Breakfast. At least I hope not.

Original post:
At this morning's National Prayer Breakfast, the president asked for prayers for, wait for it... Arnold Schwarzenegger. Why? Is Arnold's health an issue? Is he having heart trouble again? No. Here's what the president said about Arnold: (The first two paragraphs are incomprehensible gibberish, but for the record, he's trying to introduce Apprentice producer Mark Burnett and his wife Roma Downey.)

I also want to thank my great friends the Roma. Where's Roma, beautiful Roma Downey, the voice of an angel. She's got the voice -- every time I hear that voice; it's so beautiful. That -- everything is so beautiful about Roma, including her husband because he's a special, special friend. Mark Burnett for the wonderful introduction.

So true, so true. I said to the agent, I'm sorry, the only thing wrong -- I actually got on the phone and fired him myself because he said, you don't want to do it, it'll never work, it'll never, ever work, you don't want to do it. I said, listen. When I really fired him after it became the number one show, it became so successful and he wanted a commission and he didn't want to this.

That's when I really said -- but we had tremendous success on The Apprentice. And when I ran for president, I had to leave the show. That's when I knew for sure that I was doing it. And they hired a big, big movie star, Arnold Schwarzenegger, to take my place. And we know how that turned out.

The ratings went down the tubes. It's been a total disaster and Mark will never, ever bet against Trump again. And I want to just pray for Arnold if we can, for those ratings, OK?

This is embarrassing (for Trump) on many levels, and it didn't take long for Arnold to respond:




I thought about ending this post with a humorous reference to the fact that maybe ratings for The Apprentice are tanking because it airs at the same time as The Bachelor, but I can't bring myself to do it. Trump really is the President of the United States and that is beginning to be truly terrifying.