Showing posts with label tweeting the trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tweeting the trump. Show all posts

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Who? - Updated




The current secretary of defense is Dr. Mark T. Esper. Wouldn't it be cool to have a president who knows that? Yes, this is probably an autocorrect fail, but still. A fully-functioning president would have caught the change and corrected it before hitting "Send."

And one more thing. "We have secured the Oil." Huh?

Update: He fixed it, or to be more precise, he deleted the tweet and sent out a new version:




Saturday, October 12, 2019

He Chocked




So far Donald hasn't corrected this tweet from last night. If I can find a relevant clip from Friends, I'll update this post. 

Monday, October 7, 2019

In My Great And Unmatched Wisdom...






Wednesday, October 2, 2019

It's Like A Cow's Opinion. It's Moo - Updated

I wonder what made me think of that?



Update: Moot Twitter was having way too much fun with this one. Donald deleted the tweet above and sent out a corrected version:




Who cares, right? It's moo:


Saturday, August 31, 2019

The Number One Shoe? - Updated

Is Sean Hannity the number one shoe on Cable Television? Donald thinks so:




As I've said here before, posting Donald's "tweets with typos" isn't as much fun as it used to be because there are so many of them. Every now and then, however, I just can't stop myself. Enjoy.

Update: Donald doesn't always correct his typos; this time he did:


Sunday, February 24, 2019

Fireworks On The 4th Of July - Updated


Pete Souza weighed in on Instagram:



... and the Twitter snark started right away: 








There were some serious reactions too. Apparently President Nixon tried something similar and it didn't go well:




Updated on Sunday night. Must add this:



Thursday, December 20, 2018

The Nothing - Updated

According to his Twitter header, Harold Pollack is a University of Chicago professor and fellow [at] the Century Foundation. Last night he shared some intriguing observations about Donald:
































Pollack responded to a reply, which is where I got the title of this post:



And this is what Heffernan wrote, back in April, 2017:

THIS is what makes my head spin: The president is not a moral figure in any idiom, any land, any culture, any subculture. I’m not talking about the liberal enlightenment that would make him want the country to take care of the poor and sick. I mean he has no Republican values either. He has no honor among thieves, no cosa nostra loyalty, no Southern code against cheating or lying, none of the openness of New York, rectitude of Boston, expressiveness and kindness of California, no evangelical family values, no Protestant work ethic. No Catholic moral seriousness, no sense of contrition or gratitude. No Jewish moral and intellectual precision, sense of history. He doesn’t care about the life of the mind OR the life of the senses. He is not mandarin, not committed to inquiry or justice, not hospitable. He is not proper. He is not a bon vivant who loves to eat, drink, laugh. 

There’s nothing he would die for — not American values, obviously, but not the land of Russia or his wife or young son. He has some hollow success creeds from Norman Vincent Peale, but Peale was obsessed with fair-dealing and a Presbyterian pastor; Trump has no fairness or piety. He’s not sentimental; no affection for dogs or babies. No love for mothers, “the common man,” veterans. He has no sense of military valor, and is openly a coward about war. He would have sorely lacked the pagan beauty and capacity to fight required in ancient Greece. He doesn’t care about his wife or wives; he is a philanderer but he’s not a romantic hero with great love for women and sex. He commands loyalty and labor from his children not because he loves them, even; he seems almost to hate them — and if one of them slipped it would be terrifying. He does no philanthropy. 

He doesn’t — in a more secular key — even seem to have a sense of his enlightened self-interest enough to shake Angela Merkel’s hand. Doesn’t even affect a love for the arts, like most rich New Yorkers. He doesn’t live and die by aesthetics and health practices like some fascists; he’s very ugly and barely mammalian. Am I missing an obscure moral system to which he so much as nods? Also are there other people, living or dead, like him?

More than anything else I can remember reading, Pollack and Heffernan have captured the essence of Donald Trump. The emptiness, the vacuousness, the nothingness. There's just nothing there. 

Saturday afternoon update. A heartwarming paragraph from an article at The Atlantic about Jim Mattis. What a contrast with the emptiness of Donald:

The story is told of Jim Mattis, when he was the commanding general at Quantico, relieving a young lance corporal on Christmas. The rest of that wintry day, those entering the front gate of the Marine base were startled to see that the sentry was a general, checking passes and waving cars through so that a young man could spend the holiday with his family. It is the kind of behavior animated by sentiments Donald Trump could not understand, and it reflected a kind of code by which he cannot live.

I also like this: Success in government is often measured less by the brilliant things one does than by the stupidities one prevents. By that standard, Mattis’s tenure as secretary of defense was a success.

Read the article here

And how pathetic is this picture, tweeted out by Donald last night? He was supposed to go to Florida yesterday for 2+ weeks of vacation at Mar-a-Lago over the holidays. Instead, Melania and Barron went without him, leaving him alone in the oval office signing paperwork, looking forlorn and slightly vacant. Nothing. There's nothing there.   

Sunday morning, update #2, a tweet from yesterday. Melania and Barron are coming back, probably not happily.
Update #3, on Wednesday, December 26: I made the assumption that Barron would come back with his mother, but according to an article at the Daily Mail, he stayed in Florida with Ivanka and Don Jr. Read it here. And Harold Pollack has expanded his Twitter thoughts to an opinion column in the Washington Post. Read it here.

Update #4, on Sunday December 30. Apparently Melania has returned to Florida to be with Barron over the New Year holiday, leaving Donald alone at the White House. Read the Daily Mail story here. According to the Palm Beach Post, some of the swells in Palm Beach are not happy:

A source who had planned to attend the Mar-a-Lago New Year’s Eve party said Friday Palm Beach was abuzz with members and guests talking about their own plans to bail on the Trump family’s annual gala.

It’s unclear whether Mar-a-Lago will let people wiggle out of their tickets at this late date. But evidently, some club members and guests have no interest in paying extra-high ticket prices if the president will not be in attendance.
Read that article here

Monday, December 10, 2018

A Smocking Gun




Posting Donald's "tweets with typos" isn't as much fun as it used to be because there are so many of them. It's not new or novel anymore. Still, this one caught my eye, and it wasn't until I read it the second time that I realized he used the word "smocking" twice. Does he really not know that the expression he's trying for is smoking gun? Anyway, he followed with this:




Former CIA Director John Brennan responded with this, which I agree with: 
Donald is freaking out. 

Friday, December 7, 2018

Who's Dumb As A Rock? - Updated

So much for all that "Look how presidential Trump is" during the Bush funeral:


What set him off? Read about it here.

Friday afternoon update:

Friday, November 30, 2018

Just A Few Random Tweets - Updated




















































For now, at least, I'll end with this, from a couple of weeks ago. As far as I can tell, the Vice President is keeping his head down and doing his best to appear loyal in public, but when he's alone with his thoughts at the Naval Observatory... You know he's just slobbering at the possibility that Donald won't make it to January 20, 2021:


Friday afternoon update. I can't resist posting this one:
2nd update, on Saturday afternoon. In his column yesterday, Jonathan Bernstein ponders Donald's weaknesses after the midterm elections and finishes with this:

But it would surprise me if there aren’t quite a few congressional Republicans, and a fair number of party actors, who daydream about having a nice, reliable, normal president again. Perhaps some of them once believed that Mueller’s probe, which has now netted so many guilty pleas and indictments, was a witch hunt. Perhaps they believed Trump’s lawyers that Mueller would surely be wrapping things up by Thanksgiving, or New Year’s at the latest. (Oops — that was Thanksgiving 2017.)

Now, though, they surely understand that the Trump-Russia story and other scandals aren’t going away any time soon. Even in the best-case scenario, they will continue producing stories that Republicans don’t want in the headlines. And at the very worst … well, surely some Republicans are also having nightmares about just how bad the very worst could be.

I’m not predicting anything. Just noting some obvious facts. The incentives for supporting Trump that have held since his election have suddenly become a lot weaker. In mid-July of 1974, President Richard Nixon could still count on virtually every conservative Republican in Congress to oppose his impeachment and removal, even if they weren’t exactly thrilled with him. By early August, he had only a handful of supporters remaining. That’s not to say that Trump’s support will necessarily evaporate — just that if it does, it could happen extremely quickly, perhaps in days. And nice, reliable, normal Mike Pence will be sitting right there.


Like I said. Slobbering. (Is Mike Pence really nice, reliable and normal? That's a blog post for another day.)

Read Bernstein's column here.

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Donald Isn't Having Fun - Updated


Getty Images photographer John Moore captures an unsettling picture of Donald at the United Nations. My first thought when I saw it was one I've had before, i.e., why does the president always look so weird? So awkward? So uncomfortable? I've also said before that he frequently looks old and tired, which he does here as well. Regarding this specific moment, apparently this picture was taken after Donald got laughed at by the General Assembly. Are his feelings hurt? Maybe he's thinking about his other problems, including his disgusting and unfit Supreme Court nominee, what to do about the Deputy Attorney General, not to mention the actual Attorney General, and of course, the Robert Mueller investigation.

Once again it looks like being president isn't as much fun as Donald thought it would be.

Wednesday morning update: The Washington Post website is using Moore's picture with the following caption: [The president] "prepares to address the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly on September 25, 2018 in New York City." Apparently Donald was feeling sad before the delegates laughed at him. The article accompanying the picture says this, referring to the laughter:

For Trump, the moment wasn't just embarrassing. It also punctured one of the core fabulist assertions of a president who has, according to Washington Post fact-checkers, made more than 5,000 false or misleading statements since taking office. (Read the article here.)

Sunday, August 19, 2018

Do You Know How To Spell "Counsel'?

The current president of the United States doesn't:


Actually, I should say the POTUS still doesn't. See previous examples here, here, here and here.

Tuesday, August 14, 2018

Omarosa's Not A Dog

An actual tweet from the current president of the United States:


And a response from the former president's official photographer:

A post shared by Pete Souza (@petesouza) on


#ThrowShadeThenVote

Monday, July 23, 2018

Attacking Iran "To Show How Tough He Is" - Updated

In old tweets from 2012 and 2013, Donald Trump had some thoughts about the possibility of a president attacking Iran for political reasons:

Now consider this, from last night and in all caps, no less:
Update: As you would expect there's been a huge response to this tweet. I'm not going to post everything I see but I'll start with this:


To say I disagree with Bill Kristol about almost everything is an understatement and it feels strange to be posting one of his tweets here in the blog. While I'm on a roll, however, I'll also post part of his new article at the Weekly Standard titled "A Case of the Mondays." He says some nice things about Brett Kavanaugh, which I don't agree with, then says this (and note, for the record, I did not vote for Donald Trump and I do not agree to any degree with his presidency:) 

…like many other prosaic people, I can, in the spirit of The Federalist, try to contain two thoughts in my mind at the same time.

They are: Donald Trump is in many ways a bad president—bad for the country, bad for conservatism, bad for the Republican party. His sway over party and policy should be limited as much as is feasible and his dominance of our politics not extended any longer than necessary.

And Brett Kavanaugh is a good pick and should be confirmed to the Supreme Court.

In this spirit, I would also say that one might have voted for Donald Trump. One might approve to some degree of his presidency so far. But that does not mean that one approves forever or automatically, or that one is impervious to evidence of unfitness.

Soon after the midterm elections, it will be worth a step back, a deep breath, and a hard look. It will be worth asking then—as Americans, as conservatives, as Republicans—do we want four more years of a Trump presidency? No need then to relitigate who was right about this or wrong about that in 2016 or 2017 or 2018. What will be needed is to be open-minded about the right course ahead.

As our greatest president put it: “As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.” Can’t we act in the spirit of Lincoln in the age of Trump? (Read the article here.)

Monday, June 11, 2018

Tweeting The Trump



It's a big day. With the time change, it's now Tuesday morning in Singapore and the big summit is about to start. POTUS still found time to tweet, however, and in the spirit of his administration's pathetically sloppy incompetence, he just couldn't get it right. The president meant to say that "missile launches have stopped."

He also made sure to let his staff know that their work doesn't matter:

Monday, June 4, 2018

Now It's Really News - Updated


Image from CNN

The "Where Is Melania?' story appears to have hit a tipping point this morning:

At People: Melania Trump Skipping Summit with Husband but Expected to (Sort of) Show Her Face at Monday Event
At Talking Points Memo: MIA Melania Will Skip G7, North Korea Summits
At CNN: Melania Trump to attend her first public event since May 10
At Politico: Melania Trump to return to public eye Monday

There are two elements of the story here. One is that Melania is attending an event with the president this evening, although none of these headlines make clear that it will be a "no press" event, which means that we may not actually "see" the First Lady. The second interesting thing is that in spite of tonight's more-or-less return to the public, Melania is not going to Quebec for the G7 Summit this week or to Singapore for the big North Korea summit on June 12.

New York Magazine/Huff Post Reporter Yashar Ali gives us this:


I admit I'm hoping someone at the event tonight surreptitiously sneaks a few seconds of cell phone video of the First Lady.

Monday night update: She's been seen. The First Lady (or someone on her staff) tweeted out a few pictures from the event tonight and yes, she was there, sitting next to the president. Will this put an end to the story? We'll see. When will we see Melania in public again? Who knows. Not in Quebec and not in Singapore. The 4th of July? Maybe.

Here's a larger image of the top right photo: 
Return to public life: Pictured to the right of President Trump, the First Lady tweeted out pictures of herself at the Gold Star event at the White House on Monday 

Read my "Where Is Melania?" post, dated June 1, here.

Wednesday morning update: The president shares his thoughts about coverage of Melania's absence:

Here's Joe Scarborough's response:


And this is what Joe is referring to:

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

The Michael Moore Treatment?



Is Donald Trump (or Roseanne) about to get the Michael Moore treatment? Looks like it.

Sunday, May 20, 2018

He's Losing It - Updated



Yes, this really is a tweet storm from the current President of the United States. (And yes, there's a typo. It's in the second tweet.) He really is losing it.

Update: He's also repeating himself. This tweet popped up almost immediately after I published this post, three hours after the last of the original six tweets above.
I'll just keep adding the tweets:



Saturday, May 19, 2018

Melanie's Back - Updated



Sunday morning update: Thoughts from London School of Economics Fellow and author Brian Klaas about why the "Melanie" typo matters: