We
are currently in a tense brinksmanship with North Korea. If we did get into a
military confrontation with North Korea, a big part of that would almost
certainly be destroying heavily, heavily fortified facilities tied to the
nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. I’m not a military expert. I
don’t know the precise mix of primary blast versus concussion wave, the
technical issues with destroying a nuclear weapons facility with the potential
to spread nuclear contaminants, how deep the blast goes in fortified
underground facilities, whether it’s good at destroying deep, reinforced
bunkers rather than tunnels created by low tech paramilitaries, etc. etc. But I
have a very hard time believing the decision to use this weapon was not in some
way influenced by the desire to send a signal or play a bit of psychological
warfare with the North Koreans. The technical issues don’t necessarily matter.
If you want to rattle the North Koreans it can work anyway. They don’t know all
the technical realities, limitations or how risky a game we might be willing to
play. It may be enough to send the signal that Trump doesn’t operate by the
rules of his predecessors. Maybe I’m wrong. But it’s a helluva coincidence. (Read the article here.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment