Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Another One Bites The Dust

Former New York Governor George Pataki has dropped out of the race, leaving 12 declared candidates. Pataki was one of those 'Who are you and why, exactly, are you running for President" candidates, although the Washington Post had some fun pointing out that for one brief moment last summer, the former governor was tied with The Donald at 3% in national polling. (Read it here.) 

I've updated my lists.   

Declared (and still in the race) GOP Candidates, in order of their official announcement
  1. Ted Cruz (March 23) 
  2. Rand Paul (April 7)
  3. Marco Rubio (April 14)
  4. Dr. Ben Carson (May 3) 
  5. Carly Fiorina (May 4) 
  6. Mike Huckabee (May 5) 
  7. Rick Santorum (May 27)
  8. Jeb Bush (June 15)
  9. Donald Trump (June 16) 
  10. Chris Christie (June 30)
  11. John Kasich (July 21) 
  12. Jim Gilmore (July 30) 
Officially Not Running
Rob Portman (Dec 2)
Paul Ryan (Jan 12)
Mitt Romney (Jan 30)
Rick Snyder (May 7)
John Bolton (May 14) 
Mike Pence (May 20) 
Bob Ehrlich (August 4)

You're Fired!: Candidates Who Have Dropped Out
Rick Perry (June 4 - Sept. 11)
Scott Walker (July 13 - Sept. 21)
Bobby Jindal (June 24 - November 17)
Lindsey Graham (June 1 - December 21)
George Pataki (May 28 - December 29)

Days until Election Day: 313

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Catching Up

Happy holidays to all! Let's catch up. First, the covers:

Issue dated December 28, 2015
Breaking up to Making Up: Maksim Chmerkovskiy and Peta Murgatroyd's Love Story – All About the Dancing with the Stars Duo's Surprise Engagement| Dancing With the Stars, People Picks, TV News, Maksim Chmerkovskiy, Peta Murgatroyd

Issue dated January 4, 2016
Who Killed Jessica Chambers? New Information on Investigation

Nothing too exciting on either of these covers. Based on a promo I saw on Good Morning, America, the new cover this week should be the annual weight loss issue, almost certain to look very much like last year's issue:

Issue dated January 5, 2015
PEOPLE's Half Their Size 2014 Winners Revealed

Will this issue also feature a sidebar story about 2016 Bachelor Ben Higgins? Almost certainly. Will there be a blurb about Bristol Palin's new baby? Possibly. She scored a sidebar story when her pregnancy was announced; now that she's given birth, and ex-fiancé Dakota Meyer ended the suspense and claimed paternity, People may figure it's time for an update. The story's getting some pretty wide coverage, including Gulf News ("Bristol Palin gives birth to daughter,") Arab News ("Bristol Palin gives birth to 2nd out-of-wedlock child") and the South China Morning Post ("Unmarried daughter of Sarah Palin gives birth to second child.")

We're also getting ever closer to the first actual votes in the presidential election. The Iowa caucuses are February 1, following by the New Hampshire primary on February 9, with a debate on January 28 to get everyone in the mood. The field has also shrunk a little, with Senator Lindsey Graham's withdrawal on December 21. That leaves us with 13 declared candidates, possibly as few as six of whom will be featured in the primetime debate on Jan. 28. (Selection will be based on a complicated mashup of polls.) Rand Paul is in a bit of a snit about that, saying that if he's not allowed in the main debate, he won't show his face in the so-called kiddie debate. Stay tuned, things are only going to get more interesting as we move into the actual election year of 2016!

Declared (and still in the race) GOP Candidates, in order of their official announcement
  1. Ted Cruz (March 23) 
  2. Rand Paul (April 7)
  3. Marco Rubio (April 14)
  4. Dr. Ben Carson (May 3) 
  5. Carly Fiorina (May 4) 
  6. Mike Huckabee (May 5) 
  7. Rick Santorum (May 27)
  8. George Pataki (May 28)
  9. Jeb Bush (June 15)
  10. Donald Trump (June 16) 
  11. Chris Christie (June 30)
  12. John Kasich (July 21) 
  13. Jim Gilmore (July 30) 
Officially Not Running
Rob Portman (Dec 2)
Paul Ryan (Jan 12)
Mitt Romney (Jan 30)
Rick Snyder (May 7)
John Bolton (May 14) 
Mike Pence (May 20) 
Bob Ehrlich (August 4)

You're Fired!: Candidates Who Have Dropped Out
Rick Perry (June 4 - Sept. 11)
Scott Walker (July 13 - Sept. 21)
Bobby Jindal (June 24-November 17)
Lindsey Graham (June 1-December 21)

Days until Election Day: 316

Thursday, December 10, 2015

The View From Air Force One

A crew member stands in the door of Air Force One as he waits for stairs to arrive Thursday, January 8, at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. President Barack Obama was returning from a two-day trip to Michigan and Arizona.

Don't worry, this AF1 crew member isn't getting ready to jump, the plane is on the ground. He's just waiting for the airstairs so President Obama can disembark.

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

25 Most Intriguing

Issue dated December 21, 2015
Amy Schumer Tells PEOPLE Her Magic Moments from 2015

It's People's annual year-end issue, with Amy Shumer on the cover. (Last year it was Angie, below.) The Kimye baby gets a tiny topline tease, apparently not yet intriguing enough for the montage of Intriguing People on the left.

Last year's 25 Most Intriguing
Angelina Jolie on Her Biggest Moments of 2014: Marriage, Unbroken and Maddox Turning 13

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Sandra Bullock

Issue dated December 14, 2015
Sandra Bullock Adopts Daughter Laila PEOPLE Exclusive Cover

Not a whole lot to say about this one, except that it's pretty unusual that there are no sidebar stories or teases about anything. Will Saint West, aka the new Kimye baby, be on this week's cover? Probably.

Things Change

Jonathan Bernstein is a political scientist who blogs at Bloomberg News. Just over a year ago, on November 24, 2014, in a post titled "Here's the 2016 Republican Nominee," he said the next GOP nominee for president would probably come from this list of 12:

Jeb Bush
Chris Christie
Paul Ryan
Rick Perry
John Kasich
Mike Pence
Marco Rubio
Bobby Jindal
Scott Walker
Rob Portman
Mike Huckabee
Rick Santorum

A year later, what's the status of each of these candidates? Three stayed out of the race (Ryan, who's now the Speaker of the House, Pence and Portman,) three declared themselves in, didn't do well and have now declared themselves out (Perry, Jindal and Walker,) and six are still official candidates (Bush, Christie, Kasich, Rubio, Huckabee and Santorum.) 

In the article, Bernstein name-checks everyone from Rand Paul and Ted Cruz to John Thune to Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina, with various reason why they're not "viable" nominees. 

Best sentence in the whole article: "Donald Trump won't be running either..." 

Things sure have changed in a year, haven't they? For reference, here's my list of who's currently in and out of the race: 

Declared (and still in the race) GOP Candidates, in order of their official announcement
  1. Ted Cruz (March 23) 
  2. Rand Paul (April 7)
  3. Marco Rubio (April 14)
  4. Dr. Ben Carson (May 3) 
  5. Carly Fiorina (May 4) 
  6. Mike Huckabee (May 5) 
  7. Rick Santorum (May 27)
  8. George Pataki (May 28)
  9. Lindsey Graham (June 1) 
  10. Jeb Bush (June 15)
  11. Donald Trump (June 16) 
  12. Chris Christie (June 30)
  13. John Kasich (July 21) 
  14. Jim Gilmore (July 30) 
Officially Not Running
Rob Portman (Dec 2)
Paul Ryan (Jan 12)
Mitt Romney (Jan 30)
Rick Snyder (May 7)
John Bolton (May 14) 
Mike Pence (May 20) 
Bob Ehrlich (August 4)

You're Fired!: Candidates Who Have Dropped Out
Rick Perry (June 4 - Sept. 11)
Scott Walker (July 13 - Sept. 21)
Bobby Jindal (June 24-November 17)

Read the entire Bernstein post here, just remember it's from November of last year.  

Thursday, December 3, 2015

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

A Strange Story Gets Stranger

Thursday morning update: Words geek that I am, as I wrote this post yesterday afternoon I considered the possibility that the identify of Bristol's baby daddy "has not been determined" wasn't really what reporter Wendy Griffith meant to say. Perhaps she really meant "hasn't been made public," and just got sloppy or doesn't have a good editor. I thought it was possible another correction might be coming, but I was wrong. As of this morning, nothing has changed. Apparently whoever pressured the website into changing the original language is fine with what's on there now. The father's identity has not been determined. Double yikes.  

Original post:
Who, exactly, is the father of Bristol Palin's baby? Does she even know? As background, here's what I wrote on June 28, shortly after she announced her pregnancy:

Who's the daddy? So far, Bristol hasn't said. Given that she was engaged to Meyer from mid-March to mid-May and was living with him in Kentucky during the weeks prior to the wedding, the obvious guess is that he is, but she didn't say so in her announcement. ("Although Dakota and I will not be getting married, we are committed to raising this child, blah, blah, blah...") Again, one might make the case that it's nobody's business but theirs, but once you've courted the spotlight and enjoyed the good parts of being famous, that spotlight can't be turned off at will. My guess is that all the tabloids are scrambling to get the full scoop and be the first to name the father, especially if it turns out it's not Meyer.

Speaking of Dakota Meyer, what's really going on here? I admit, I'm curious. A surprise engagement to be followed by a quickie wedding two months later seemed a little strange. Then in the week before the wedding it came out that Meyer had been married before and kept it secret, followed by news that the wedding was off. Bristol insisted at the time that she had known all about the first marriage but if so, why was the wedding cancelled? Then came the pregnancy announcement with its conspicuous lack of an identified father. The whole thing is just strange.

Yesterday, in an article previewing her upcoming interview with Sarah Palin, CBN News reporter Wendy Griffith wrote,  "...the tabloids went into overdrive when the long-awaited marriage of her [Sarah Palin's] 25-year-old daughter Bristol didn't happen, even though she's pregnant with her ex-fiancé's baby."

Her ex-fiancé's baby? Did Griffith just confirm what Sarah, Bristol and Meyer had all conspicuously declined to confirm? Not exactly. A close reading of the article makes clear that the reporter wasn't quoting Palin directly when she referred to the "ex-fiancé's baby;" most likely she had just assumed the most obvious possibility. As of this morning however, the article has been changed to read "the father's identity has not been determined." Yikes. 

The father's identity has not been determined? Really? Bristol really doesn't know who the father is? This story just keeps getting stranger and stranger. You can read the current version of the CBN story here; my original blog post about the pregnancy is here

Monday, November 23, 2015

Sexiest Man David Beckham, Adele

Issue dated December 7, 2015
Inside Adele's Life Now: She's 'In the Best Place Ever'| Adele

Issue dated November 30, 2015
David Beckham Is PEOPLE's Sexiest Man Alive!| Sexiest Man Alive, Sexiest Man Alive, Sexiest Man Alive Ad Tag, David Beckham

I got a little behind posting the covers; this brings us up to date. The new issue is posted a couple of days early, presumably because of the holiday later this week. Based on the number of "Sofia's getting married" stories at people.com over the week-end I had figured she'd get the main cover story this week, but apparently Adele is bigger news. I had a moment of thinking "Another Kennedy story, really?" but then I remembered - yesterday was Nov. 22, the 52nd anniversary of the assassination, always a hook for a Kennedy story about something or other. I have no idea what "shocking tapes" the headline refers to.

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Happy Geography Awareness Week!

National Geographic believes Americans need to know more about geography, and based on this tweet from presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson, they're absolutely right:

Screen Shot 2015-11-18 at 8.58.02 AM

What's wrong with this picture? Look closely up in the northeast corner of the country. Dr. Carson has misplaced the New England states. Yes, I know, it probably wasn't the good doctor himself who created this graphic, but still - it's got his name on it. The tweet has now been deleted but as always happens, a few enterprising souls captured the screenshot for all eternity before it disappeared.

You can read more about Geography Awareness Week here.

This Day In History, 1985: Calvin And Hobbes


Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Bye, Bye, Bobby!

Wednesday morning update: The Fix blog has a couple of fun graphs this morning. First, Jindal's polling compared with The Donald's:



I like this chart too, which tracks the start and (future) end dates of both the D and the R campaigns:




Original Post:
Qzyemgpk9ezhb8byknza

I think I got campaign overload there for a while, when I had to step back a bit from closely following everything that happens in the race for president. Today, however, another Republican candidate dropped out of the race and that was enough to bring me back to the blog. Bobby Jindal, currently the (term-limited) governor of Louisiana never got much traction and didn't even get to debate with the big guys on the main stage. His fund-raising was disappointing and his poll numbers were in the cellar, so today he packed it in, saying "I've come to the realization this is not my time." This leaves us with 14 declared candidates; who do you suppose will drop out next? I've updated my lists: 

Declared (and still in the race) GOP Candidates, in order of their official announcement
  1. Ted Cruz (March 23) 
  2. Rand Paul (April 7)
  3. Marco Rubio (April 14)
  4. Dr. Ben Carson (May 3) 
  5. Carly Fiorina (May 4) 
  6. Mike Huckabee (May 5) 
  7. Rick Santorum (May 27)
  8. George Pataki (May 28)
  9. Lindsey Graham (June 1) 
  10. Jeb Bush (June 15)
  11. Donald Trump (June 16) 
  12. Chris Christie (June 30)
  13. John Kasich (July 21) 
  14. Jim Gilmore (July 30) 
Officially Not Running
Rob Portman (Dec 2)
Paul Ryan (Jan 12)
Mitt Romney (Jan 30)
Rick Snyder (May 7)
John Bolton (May 14) 
Mike Pence (May 20) 
Bob Ehrlich (August 4)

You're Fired!: Candidates Who Have Dropped Out
Rick Perry (June 4 - Sept. 11)
Scott Walker (July 13 - Sept. 21)
Bobby Jindal (June 24 - November 17)

Days until Election Day: 356
Note that we're inside a year. Election Day 2016 is Tuesday, Nov. 8. 

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Honoring Those Who Serve

Kardashian Overload

These are the top stories currently posted at People.com:

  1. Kendall Jenner walks the Victoria Secret fashion show
  2. Something about last night's GOP debate
  3. Caitlyn and Kris share a hug at the VS show
  4. Kim K tweets that she's gained 52 pounds
  5. Scott Disick leaves rehab traveling in a private jet
  6. Kendall was nervous before the VS show
  7. Lamar keeps asking about Khloé's new boyfriend 

Yuck. Isn't there anything else going on in the world? Well, yes. The pregnant Duggar daughter gave birth last week and I'm pretty sure that will be the main story when the new cover comes out shortly after 7.00.

And here's the new cover, ick, ick, ick.

Issue dated November 23, 2015
Jessa (Duggar) Seewald Opens Up About Difficult Home Birth and Why She Was Rushed to the Hospital: 'Everything Was Different Than I Expected'| Babies, TV News, Ben Seewald, Jessa Duggar

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Really?, Part 3

Pregnant Kim Kardashian Sheer Jumpsuit

Every now and then I'm so struck by one of Mrs. West's outfits, or lack thereof, that I just have to immortalize it in my blog. (See previous examples here, here and here.)

And what will Kimye name the 2nd baby? I think I read somewhere that South is not an option but you never know.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Leah Remini

Issue dated November 16, 2015
Leah Remini Opens up to PEOPLE About Leaving Scientology

People posted the new cover a day early and for the third week in a row, the main cover story is tied to a book written (and being publicized) by a famous and attractive woman. I figured Halle Berry's Celebrity Divorce would be front and center this week but she and Olivier are downgraded to a sidebar. I'm happy to note that there no Kardashians and no Duggars to be seen. This is a good thing.

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

It's Khloé

Mid-morning update: Apparently Khloé is taking some heat for her People cover story. Her tweets provide some good "inside baseball" about how things really get done. She's not happy about the pushback but overall this is good for book sales, and for rating for KUWTK Season 11, which starts November 15.  
















Original post:
Issue dated November 9, 2015
Khloé Kardashian Opens Up About Lamar Odom's Harrowing Ordeal: I'll Always Be There for Him| Breakups, Couples, Health, TV News, Khloe Kardashian, Lamar Odom

Kholé gets the big cover story this week, at least partly tied to her "revealing new book." Remember that Khloé was at a "photo shoot for People" when she got word of Lamar's collapse at the brothel two weeks ago and my bet is that like Drew Barrymore last week, this cover was planned in advance as part of a media blitz to sell books.

Did People luck out with the timing of the Lamar Odom story? ("The reality star spoke to People about her new life - just hours before Lamar Odom was found unconscious. Now Khloé opens up about her bedside vigil and what's next.") Oh, you bet. Did Khloé luck out with the timing of her book release? Oh, you bet. If all this makes you want to rush out and buy the book, it comes out officially on November 3; you can pre-order it at Amazon for $17.88

Khloé Kardashian Strips Off for New Book

Monday, October 26, 2015

If You're Not Nice To Me, I'm Going Home

Who said it?

"If this election is about how we’re going to fight to get nothing done, then I don’t want anything -- I don’t want any part of it. I don’t want to be elected president to sit around and see gridlock just become so dominant that people literally are in decline in their lives. That is not my motivation. I’ve got a lot of really cool things I could do other than sit around, being miserable, listening to people demonize me and feeling compelled to demonize them. That is a joke. Elect Trump if you want that."

John Ellis Bush, also known as Jeb!, in South Carolina on Sunday, when asked if his campaign is beginning to "run out of steam." If that doesn't sound particularly presidential, how about this, also from Jeb!: 

"Blah, blah, blah, blah, that's my answer, blah, blah, blah."

Drew Barrymore

Issue dated November 2, 2015
Drew Barrymore: 'I Had the Weirdest Life Ever'

Here's last week's cover, with Drew Barrymore as the main story. Yes, I'm surprised, because after all the salacious coverage of the drug overdose/sex pills/brothel visit/2 prostitutes/we're staying married etc., I figured Lamar would be front and center. It's certainly been the biggest story at people.com for the last two weeks. Why does Drew Barrymore get the main story, with Khloé and Lamar bumped to a sidebar? She has a book coming out, titled Wildfire, and I'm assuming a People cover package was an agreed-to-in-advance part of her media tour/publicity campaign. She's also on the cover of the November issue of In Style.



And here's the actual book:

Drew Barrymore's New Book Wildflower: See the Cover

Friday, October 23, 2015

Bye, Jim! Bye, Joe! Bye, Linc!

The Republicans get most of the attention because they're more entertaining, but there are a few Democrats running for president too. This week, that list got cut in half. The last time I published the list of Democratic candidates, on July 5, it looked like this, with Vice President Biden waiting in the wings but not yet declared:

Declared Democratic Candidates
  1. Hillary Clinton (April 12)
  2. Bernie Sanders (May 26) 
  3. Martin O'Malley (May 30) 
  4. Lincoln Chafee (June 3)
  5. Jim Webb (July 2)  
On Wednesday, Jim Webb looked reality square in the face and dropped out; later the same day Joe Biden announced that he would not be dropping in. And now this morning, (former Rhode Island governor) Lincoln Chaffee, who according to Salon.com was averaging precisely 0.0% in Real Clear Politic's average of national polls, also dropped out. As Salon put it: "Congratulations, Martin O'Malley. You're in third place!" 

I've updated my list: 

Declared Democratic Candidates
  1. Hillary Clinton (April 12)
  2. Bernie Sanders (May 26) 
  3. Martin O'Malley (May 30)
The Republican list is unchanged since Scott Walker dropped out on September 21; their next debate is Wednesday, Oct. 28. According to the Washington Post, this is how the candidates will be lined up on the CNBC stage, with 10 candidates in the main debate and 4 at the earlier, so-called "undercard" debate:
:  

Any guesses for who will be the next Republican to drop out?

Days until Election Day: 381

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Carrie Underwood

Issue dated October 26, 2015


I realized I never posted last week's cover, featuring Carrie Underwood, another Attractive Blonde Woman With A Child.

Will Lamar Odom's story be front and center on the cover that comes out tomorrow? Almost certainly. Will People be able to resist another Duggar story, tied to the new show featuring two of the daughters? I fervently hope so.

Saturday, October 17, 2015

In The 2000s, And It Was Horrible

How important is it for a president to be articulate? To know what he or she is talking about? To be able to express his or her thoughts in a coherent way? Jeb! keeps giving us reasons to ponder those questions. In his defense, his brother wasn't the most articulate guy either and he managed to get elected twice, so maybe Jeb! figures it's not that important. The difference is that 43 ran and was elected in the days before cell phone videos, YouTube and Twitter. In those olden days candidates could say something less than brilliant and it might be shown on the evening news or the Sunday talk shows, but it wouldn't go live on YouTube for the whole world to watch, think and blog about.

Jeb! doesn't have that luxury. Once again he's put his (silver) foot in his mouth and it's right there on YouTube:



Presidential? You decide.

Thursday, October 15, 2015

Lamar Odom

One more update on Friday night: It turns out I was right with my update below. One of the entertainment shows had a segment tonight with a reporter interviewing a woman who's the manager of the Love Ranch. She said Odom insisted that all the women he came in contact with sign confidentiality agreements. Wow. I think it's safe to say he'll be seriously mortified when he realizes how "not confidential" his activities at the Love Ranch have become. It's not just the cocaine, the fake Viagra and the prostitutes. We now know he selected his two companions out of a lineup, which apparently is how they do it at brothels. We know that he had been texting with a working girl named Madison Montag, who is the brothel's token transgender prostitute, although in the end he selected two other "girls." We've seen the surveillance video from the first day and the credit card receipt showing a charge of $75,000. This really is a sad and disturbing story on so many levels. Based on what I've read Odom is still a very sick man and a full recovery is by no means guaranteed. It will be wonderful if he does recover, but at that point he'll be in for a very different kind of hurt.

Friday afternoon update: There are unofficial reports that Odom is improving slightly - he may have opened his eyes and some sites are even saying he "communicated verbally," i.e., spoke. Maybe. I had an admittedly strange thought about what could happen if he does fully recover. Given Odom's struggles with the harsh and unforgiving spotlight of fame, I'm guessing he won't be pleased to learn that the whole world knows he went to a brothel, did cocaine, took a sexual enhancement supplement and spent the week-end screwing his brains out with not one but two prostitutes, at a reported cost of $75,000.  

Friday morning update: I now know what Kanye West is up to, or at least what Kardashian employer E! wants us to think he's up to: he's home watching the kids (his daughter North and Kourtney's three kids.) That's a little hard for me to picture but, you know, whatever. Read about it here.

And one more thing about Kanye and Kim: back in August, 2013, a few weeks after Miss North West was born, I wrote that I gave Kimye two years as a couple, tops. (Read it here.) That would have taken them to August of this year, by which time I was pretty sure that they would have fallen out of love, or lust, or whatever it is that they're in, and gone their separate ways. August has come and gone, of course, and I humbly admit I was wrong. Apparently Kimye is still going strong. I still can't see them celebrating their 10th anniversary, and possibly not even their 5th, but for better or worse, they're still together now, and that's something.

Original post:


The big news in pop culture this week, of course, is the sad situation with Lamar Odom. As I'm writing on Thursday afternoon, things don't look good for Odom, although there have been no official announcements about his condition, one way or the other, from the hospital or the Kardashians. Jesse Jackson visited the hospital yesterday then announced that Odom was "improving," although he walked that back slightly later in the day. Today, apparently TMZ is reporting that Odom shows no signs of improvement and doctors are telling family members to expect the worst, even as there are reports that he may have squeezed Khloé's hand, or maybe it was Kim's hand. As an example of the feeding frenzy around this story, the Hollywood Life website posted contradictory stories an hour and seven minutes apart:

12.45 p.m. Lamar Odom Opens Eyes And Squeezes Kim Kardashian's Hand In Hospital -- Report
1.52 p.m. Lamar Odom: Kardashian's Hopes Fading As Doctors Say His Condition Worsens

My thoughts:

Where's Kanye? Kim flew to Las Vegas with Khloé Tuesday night. It's being reported that she canceled a baby shower scheduled for this week-end, and will be returning to LA for a doctor's appointment on Friday. Who's missing from all this? Her husband. I've been following this story pretty closely all around the internet and not one, not a single one of the many, many stories I've read has said anything about Kanye West. It's as if he doesn't exist.

Asking For Privacy. It's now standard practice for any celebrity experiencing almost any kind of life event to request "privacy at this difficult time," and apparently the Kardashians have requested the same. I don't mean to be disrespectful but there's more than a little irony there. The Kardashians are requesting privacy? Really? Isn't their entire empire built on letting it all hang out on camera? I promise I'm not being snarky when I say that that ship has sailed. The media abhors a vacuum and it's now been almost 48 hours since the story broke. In the absence of any comments from the K's or Odom's doctors, pretty much everyone else is rushing to talk, with or without any actual, factual information. There's just no way to stop it.

As Famous As I Wanna Be: I've written before about the perils of fame in America and one of the undercurrents of the Odom story is that hitching his star to the Kardashian fame machine is at least part of what led him to this point. True? Maybe, partly. His ex-girlfriend, mother to his three children (one of whom died of SIDS,) has said they were together for 10 years, and got engaged, but he always refused to get married. Then, shortly after they broke up, he married Khloé a month after meeting her. Was the opportunity to get famous on her television show at least part of the appeal? In August, 2013, when Odom's substance abuse and DUI first came to light, Allison Samuels wrote about Odom at The Daily Beast, indicating that he longed for Kardashian-level fame:

“He wanted all the fame and fortune the Kardashian family could give him, but never considered the price he’d pay for it.’’
That price, says the friend, has come in the form of constant cameras and media attention pointed his way. The media’s never-ending obsession with the Kardashian clan quickly began to cause the NBA player tremendous emotional distress, according to those who know him well.

“Lamar was a second-level sports star, particularly on a team like the Lakers with Kobe Bryant,’’ said one former Lakers player. “Not sure he understood that, but he wasn’t in Us and People magazine every week. There was a limit in interest in him off the court. But the Kardashians have an all-consuming fame that Lamar was not prepared for at all. It really is that old saying of ‘Be careful what you wish for.’ He wished for fame, but this hadn’t been on his own terms.’’

… “Not sure why the Lakers agreed to let him do that show at all,’’ says a teammate. “It was a big distraction for him and the team. But he wanted that celebrity so bad that Phil Jackson and others just didn’t want to deny him.
Kris Jenner

In a story written last night, Adrian Wojnarowski at Yahoo Sports talks about the costs of that fame:

In recent days too, the Kardashians refused to stop exploiting Odom on that reality show, turning what appeared to be a lost soul in crisis reaching out to his ex-wife only to have his phone calls manufactured into Khloe-Kim argument fodder for one more dreadful episode.
Sex, drugs, a disconsolate Khloe, and Kobe leaving the Lakers locker room at the MGM Grand Arena to get to the hospital. Poor Lamar Odom, unwittingly delivering them a trailer.
So, Khloe ended up at his bedside in Vegas, with her mother, Kris Jenner, dramatically pacing outside Sunrise Hospital in Vegas. The Rev. Jesse Jackson emerged onto the scene to make public proclamations. All the way until now, Odom played the part of a prop, a recurring character in the Kardashian cesspool.
Truth be told, the Kardashians transformed Odom’s frailties and flaws into a societal fascination. Around the Lakers, they would always tell you that the scrutiny of the show played a part in his undoing, that it made a largely shy and private guy far more exposed and vulnerable than he ever imagined. Privately, Odom would tell friends that he never imagined the impact that an entanglement with the Kardashians’ glare would have on his existence.
“You can get tickets for the Oscars, some good perks,” he once told a friend, “but I had no idea what the rest of it would be like.”

How will the story end?  There's no way to know right now. It's just sad. 

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Best Sentence Ever?

Very possibly:


Monday, October 12, 2015

In A Cubs Frame Of Mind

When I sent this tweet out on August 21, a play-off game at Wrigley seemed like an impossible dream.




Now the first pitch is just a few hours away. If the Cubs can win both home games, it's on to the NLCS!  Go Cubs!

It Could Happen Again




108 years later, yes, it could happen again!  Go Cubs!

Saturday, October 10, 2015

Really, People, Hire An Editor!

What's wrong with this picture, or more specifically, with these words, taken from the people.com article about Pippa Middleton?

In happier times, Pippa and Nico, who works for a bank in Geneva, had took a short vacation in Venice, Italy, in April, just before the birth of her niece Princess Charlotte. A few days after leaving Venice, they were spotted having a romantic dinner date in London.   

And Pippa has been spending a lot of time with ex-boyfriend James Matthews. Not only was he by her side on vacation (along with brother James, his girlfriend Donna Air, and parents Carol and Michael) in St. Barts recently, they also competed in the grueling Otillo race in Sweden together (he was James Middleton's teammate but the group ran half the course as a foursome) . 

So what's wrong? Consider: 

1. In the first sentence of the first paragraph: "had took a short vacation in Venice..." Really? Had "took"? You don't need a Masters in Journalism to know that it should be "had taken." Really. 

2. In the second sentence of the second paragraph, Pippa's mother's name is misspelled. Non-royalty buffs might not know that her name is spelled "Carole," but I don't think it's expecting too much for the people at People to know. Really. 

Finally, for extra credit, there's an extra space in front of the period at the end of the 2nd paragraph, which just makes the whole thing look messy. 

Read the article here

Friday, October 9, 2015

A Dog's Life

Who's the cutest member of the Obama family? Bo, of course! According to Politico, today is Bo's 7th birthday and we want to send warmest birthday wishes to the First Dog. Woof!

Journalists take photos of Bo at the White House in July 2015.

Click here for more very cute pictures of Bo!

Wednesday, October 7, 2015

On This Day In History: October 7, 1915

What was happening 100 years ago? The New York Times archive provides a fascinating glimpse, with the complete paper from this day in 1915 now available online. Although the country and the world were in the throes of World War 1, which had started on July 28, 1914 and wouldn't end until November 11, 1918, the lead story was about the personal life of President Woodrow Wilson: 

"President to wed Mrs. Norman Galt, intimate friend of his daughters; also comes out for woman suffrage." 

If you're not familiar with the quaint-sounding word "suffrage," it refers to the right to vote, which American women wouldn't enjoy nationally for five more years. 

Other headlines: 
  • Wilson indorses woman suffrage [Note: "indorse" is not a typo, that's how the headline is written. According to dictionary.com, it means, no surprise, "endorse."]
  • All allied envoys leave Sofia; Bulgar ultimatum sent to Serbs; more French and British troops land" 
  • Greece aroused by cabinet crisis
  • Venizelos says: "Greece will keep her word to Serbia to the last man and the last drachma" 
  • French take a hill in foe's second line
  • Midvale steel company heads big merger
  • President favors ample defense
  • British troops land at Saloniki
I know almost nothing about World War 1 and not much more about the process by which women finally got the right to vote in America. The paper in total consists of 20 pages (and cost one penny,) and I could spend most the the day paging through it and learning about life in America 100 years ago today. I probably won't do that, although it's tempting, and the entire archive is behind the Times' paywall, so I can't disappear completely into the day-to-day world of 1915. Still, if you'd like to read about the president's fiancée and the great war, click here

Blake Shelton

Mid-morning update:  I often say that People loves a good celebrity divorce and it continues to be true. This is actually the second cover story devoted to the Blake/Miranda divorce; the first was dated August 3:

Blake Shelton and Miranda Lambert Divorce: What Went Wrong?

I also have my usual media literacy reminder about the new cover story. With headline language including "more details" and a quote ("I'm in a good place") readers are clearly supposed to think that People scored an actual interview with Shelton. Based on the teaser story at people.com however, this is almost certainly not the case. All the info in the online article is attributed to a "close friend of the country singer," and "another pal," a good indication that Shelton did not, in fact, "open up" about his divorce to the magazine.

Original Post:
Issued dated October 19, 2015
Blake Shelton Moving On: 'He's Not Someone to Sit Around'

Not much to say about this week's cover, except that I had been expecting that the Oregon shootings might be the main story. (I'm surprised, in a good way, that People chose not to feature Jim Carrey's ex-girlfriend, who apparently committed suicide a few days ago.) As for the Shonda Rhimes sidebar, People loves a weight loss story, but the Shonda story was posted on the website a few days ago and can you guess how she lost all that weight? Sensible eating and exercise, what a surprise.

There's also a Bristol Palin story on the website today, although poor Bristol didn't rate a cover mention. Apparently she's vacationing in Hawaii at 7 months pregnant, accompanied by her first child Tripp and her younger brother Trig. (What do you suppose she'll name the new baby? Twig? Twilight? Tron? The possibilities boggle the mind.) I admit I'm still curious about the baby-to-be, and more specifically, who the proud daddy-to-be might be. Is it ex-fiancé Dakota Meyer? Probably, but why the secrecy? As I've said before the whole thing is just weird. (Read what I was thinking when the pregnancy was first announced here.)  If you're curious, here's the picture:

Bristol Palin Enjoys Fun in the Sun with Son Tripp

Monday, October 5, 2015

How Things Look Today

Political Scientist Jonathan Bernstein is out with a new ranking of GOP candidates for president:

First Tier: Jeb! Bush and Marco Rubio
Second Tier: John Kasich
Third Tier: Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, Chris Christie and Rick Santorum

What about the others? No chance:

Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina and five other candidates remain, [Cruz, R. Paul, Pataki, Graham and Gilmore] but they either fail to have conventional credentials for the job or don't hold a sufficient number of orthodox Republican positions. Or too many people just plain dislike them. Could one of them win? Only if I'm reading the evidence wrong. Or if what political scientists think they know about nominations is wrong. And so far, I see no sign of that.

Bernstein says Bobby Jindal might be the next candidate to drop out; read the article here

Saturday, October 3, 2015

This Day In History, 1955: Premiere Of The Mickey Mouse Club


Friday, October 2, 2015

This Day In History, 1985: Rock Hudson Dies Of AIDS

Issue dated October 21, 1985
The Monroe Report

Has it really been 30 years? Rock Hudson died of AIDS on October 2, 1985, and thirty years later it can be easy to forget what a big deal it was at the time, a key milestone in the fight against AIDS. Here's how People's cover story explains it:

Rock Hudson's death, at age 59 on October 2 at his Beverly Hills home, brought his life into bold relief. The circumstances of his demise assured the actor a place in Hollywood history that his films could not. As the first public figure to announce his affliction with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, Hudson had stunned the world and shattered an image cultivated over three decades. Hudson's admission, 10 weeks before his death, was cause for canonization in both the medical and gay communities. "His illness and death have moved the fight against AIDS ahead more in three months than anything in the past three years," says Bruce Decker, chairman of California's AIDS Advisory Board Committee. "I'm sure Rock's coming out will stand as a landmark in the gay community," says activist Armistead Maupin.

Read the story here.

Thursday, October 1, 2015

"Big Boy Pants"? Is This How A President Talks?

Image result for jeb bush
photo from the Huffington Post.

Really, Jeb!? Big boy pants? As I said a few posts ago, I know Donald Trump is getting under your skin and your path to the (maybe) nomination is a lot harder than you thought it would be. Still, saying that Trump needs to "put on his big boy pants" doesn't make you sound like the grown-up in the room. Is that really the best you can do?

Read the story here.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Back To The Blog: It's The Donald

Issue dated October 12, 2015
At Home with Donald Trump and His Family| 2016 Presidential Elections, People, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivana Trump, Ivanka Trump

I've been away from the blog for a few weeks and I'm happy to say that after a couple of days in the hospital, a couple of weeks at a skilled nursing facility and a few days at home moving around with a cane, I'm the proud owner/user of a new left hip. Has anything been happening while I was away from the blog? Yes, oh yes.

I've been figuring we'd get a People cover featuring The Donald and here it is. According to the teaser article at people.com, wife Melania and son Barron are already planning their move to the White House, with Melania reassuring Barron that although he'll miss his friends, his father will be able to "help children like him" and it's all good. (I have to ask: how much help do the children of billionaires really need?)

There's a Duggar story too, ick, ick, ICK!! The fact that some presumably rational advertisers think there's an approving market for more television shows about this wretched family makes me want to scream, scream, SCREAM!! Please, make it stop.

There's also news in the political world, specifically, two GOP presidential candidates, Rick Perry and wow, Scott Walker, have officially dropped out. For months pundit after pundit has had Walker in their top 3, but apparently he just wasn't ready for prime time and couldn't perform at the national/presidential level. I'm updating my lists and in honor of The Donald, I'm going to call the new list of withdrawn candidates the "You're Fired!" list. Here goes:

Declared (and still in the race) GOP Candidates, in order of their official announcement
  1. Ted Cruz (March 23) 
  2. Rand Paul (April 7)
  3. Marco Rubio (April 14)
  4. Dr. Ben Carson (May 3) 
  5. Carly Fiorina (May 4) 
  6. Mike Huckabee (May 5) 
  7. Rick Santorum (May 27)
  8. George Pataki (May 28)
  9. Lindsey Graham (June 1) 
  10. Jeb Bush (June 15)
  11. Donald Trump (June 16) 
  12. Bobby Jindal (June 24) 
  13. Chris Christie (June 30)
  14. John Kasich (July 21) 
  15. Jim Gilmore (July 30) 
Officially Not Running
Rob Portman (Dec 2)
Paul Ryan (Jan 12)
Mitt Romney (Jan 30)
Rick Snyder (May 7)
John Bolton (May 14) 
Mike Pence (May 20) 
Bob Ehrlich (August 4)

You're Fired!: Candidates Who Have Dropped Out

Rick Perry (June 4 - Sept. 11)
Scott Walker (July 13 - Sept. 21)

Days until Election Day: 404

Sunday, September 6, 2015

The Secretary Of Energy

Sunday afternoon update: Moniz's predecessor as Secretary of Energy was Steven Chu, who has a Ph.D in Physics from the University of California, Berkeley and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1997. His predecessor was Samuel Bodman, who has a Doctorate of Science in Chemical Engineering from M.I.T. 

Original Post: 
The current Secretary of Energy is Dr. Ernest Moniz. He has a Doctorate in Theoretical Physics from Stanford University, as well as a few other credentials, as outlined at energy.gov:  

Prior to his appointment, Dr. Moniz was the Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics and Engineering Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he was a faculty member since 1973. At MIT, he headed the Department of Physics and the Bates Linear Accelerator Center. Most recently, Dr. Moniz served as the founding Director of the MIT Energy Initiative and as Director of the MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment where he was a leader of multidisciplinary technology and policy studies on the future of nuclear power, coal, nuclear fuel cycles, natural gas and solar energy in a low-carbon world.

From 1997 until January 2001, Dr. Moniz served as Under Secretary of the Department of Energy. He was responsible for overseeing the Department’s science and energy programs, leading a comprehensive review of nuclear weapons stockpile stewardship, and serving as the Secretary’s special negotiator for the disposition of Russian nuclear materials. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Associate Director for Science in the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President.

In addition to his work at MIT, the White House and the Department of Energy, Dr. Moniz has served on a number of boards of directors and commissions involving science, energy and security. These include President Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, the Department of Defense Threat Reduction Advisory Committee, and the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future.

A member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Dr. Moniz is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Humboldt Foundation, and the American Physical Society.

Dr. Moniz received a Bachelor of Science degree summa cum laude in Physics from Boston College, a Doctorate in Theoretical Physics from Stanford University, and honorary degrees from the University of Athens, the University of Erlangen-Nurenberg, Michigan State University and Universidad Pontificia de Comillas.

There are many things about Sarah Palin that annoy me, including the fact that she doesn't know what she doesn't know. To be blunt, she's too stupid to know how stupid she is. Her extravagant, preening, clueless self-regard was on full display this morning during her appearance on CNN, when she announced that she wants to be the Secretary of Energy. (And insisted that we should all just speak "American.") The fact that Jake Tapper had her as a guest and acted as if she was actually qualified to comment on anything is a sad comment on the state of our media and leaves me shaking my head in sadness and despair. Hopefully we can chalk it up to the holiday week-end with all of the regular pundits were all on vacation. Otherwise, seriously Jake, what were you thinking?  

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Really, Jeb!?

I know Donald Trump is getting under your skin. I know your path to the GOP nomination is turning out to be a lot harder than you expected. (And way, way harder than your brother's in 1999-2000. So unfair.)

I know you're doing everything you can think of to take down The Donald, but really. You want to be the leader of the free world and this is the best you can do?:

Would you rather support a candidate who

Strives to shake every hand everywhere

OR 

Is a germophobe when it comes to shaking hands

From a quiz at Jeb!'s website, see the whole thing here

And in case you're wondering, yes, the $75 guacamole bowl is still available for purchase on Jeb!'s website; wonder how many they've sold. 

Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Rosemary Kennedy

Issue dated September 14, 2015
Untold Story of Rosemary Kennedy and Her Disastrous Lobotomy

I wasn't expecting a Kennedy cover story and certainly not one about Rosemary Kennedy, but apparently she's the subject of two new books, so there she is. There's no question it's an intriguing story, a secret sister, disabled and hidden away, but it's also old news. The headline sounded familiar to me so I scrolled back through the People Cover posts, and sure enough, from last November there it is, a sidebar story on Matthew McConaughey's cover, "The Forgotten Kennedy Sister," which turned out to be Rosemary. That story was tied to publication of a book called "Fully Alive" by Timothy Shriver, who is chairman of the Special Olympics. (Read the article here.)

Issue dated November 17, 2014
Matthew McConaughey Writes for PEOPLE: 10 Moments That Changed Me

Blog readers know I'm fascinated by the Kennedys, both current and historic, but I've always assumed that not everyone else is. Still, apparently there's enough interest that People's editors believe a cover story with a black and white picture of a relatively unknown woman, who was born in 1918 and died in 2005, will sell well. According to the article at people.com, the new books are "Rosemary, The Hidden Kennedy Daughter," by Kate Larson, and "The Missing Kennedy," by Elizabeth Koehler-Pentacoff.

In a depressing coincidence, both of these issues also feature Duggar stories, Jessa's wedding last November and the on-going scandal around Josh in the new issue. Ick.

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Diana And The Queen

Friday morning update: I've realized that there may be some confusion about what exactly is being commemorated on September 9. Hartley merely says "by the time she was 90" and "by the end of AD 2015." To be specific, on Wednesday, the Queen will have passed Queen Victoria and become the longest-reigning monarch in British history.

I also thought that having posted the first picture of Diana, I'd post one of the last as well, from her photo shoot for Mario Testino in the Spring of 1997. I've always thought this was one of the best pictures ever taken of Diana and it's fascinating to observe how much she changed in 17 years.

Image result for Princess Diana Mario Testino

Original post:
Have you ever seen this picture?


This is the first picture of Lady Diana Spencer to ever appear in a newspaper or magazine. It was taken in July, 1980 by Arthur Edwards, a photographer for the Sun newspaper, who has been snapping royals since 1974. Diana would have just turned 19, Charles, who's not in the picture, was 31. In The Diana Chronicles, Tina Brown explains how the picture came to be. Edwards and Sun reporter Harry Arnold were at a polo match featuring the Prince of Wales. They "spotted her [Diana] there, a fresh-faced girl they vaguely recognized with a gold letter D hanging around her neck, who seemed to be included in the royal party. The resourceful Edwards took some pictures for his files, just in case."

A couple of months later, during Diana's famous visit to Scotland, she was spotted by reporters while fishing with Prince Charles by the side of the River Dee. Photographer Edwards figured this was the same girl from the polo match in July and pulled the picture out of his file. On September 8, 1980, The Sun ran the picture on its front page, with a headline that said "He's in love again. Lady Di is the new girlfriend for Charles." This was also the first time Diana was called "Lady Di," and the name stuck. It sure seems like a long time ago, doesn't it?

Yesterday, August 31, marked the 18th year since Diana died and I've got the royals on my mind. Some years I note the anniversary and blog about it; some years I don't. (Read what I was thinking on the 15th anniversary in 2012 here.) Things certainly have changed since the "Diana era," and if you weren't paying attention at the time, or don't think about the royals as often as I sometimes do, it's easy to forget how truly chaotic, and yes, undignified, things got in the late 80s and early 90s as Charles and Di did battle with each other. Things have settled down now, everyone's behaving themselves, mostly, and there's an intriguing milestone coming up on September 9.

HMTQ Landing Page BurnleyImage result for Book "Accession" by John Hartley

In 1992, at the 40th anniversary of the Queen's accession to the throne, British journalist John Hartley published a charming book titled "Accession." It told the story, in great detail, of King George VI's death at age 56, while his daughter Princess Elizabeth was visiting Kenya, and the events surrounding her return to London and assumption of the role of Queen. At the end of the book, Hartley "did the math" based on how things looked as he was writing in 1991. At the time, Charles and Diana were still married, the Queen was 66, Charles was 44 and abdication by the Queen at some future date was considered at least theoretically possible:

"Assuming that the queen does not abdicate and continues to enjoy good health, she will celebrate her seventieth birthday on 26 [sic] April 1996. Two months later, on 14 June 1996 - and coinciding almost to the day with her "Official" birthday  she will have reigned longer than her namesake Queen Elizabeth I, who reigned for forty-four years, four months and seven days. On 20 November 1997, the Queen and Prince Philip will celebrate their Golden Wedding. On 6 February 2002, the Queen will celebrate the Golden Jubilee of her Accession to the throne. She will then be only seventy-five years old.

... If one were to assume further, that the queen were to continue as Monarch after her Golden Jubilee, she would celebrate her Diamond Jubilee in AD 2012 at the age of eighty-five. Were she to live as long as her mother, the Queen Mother, she would have outlived and outreigned every other British Monarch by the time she was 90. Her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria, died aged eighty-one, having reigned for 63 years and 216 days. The present Queen would eclipse this record by the end of AD 2015, when she would be only eighty-nine." 

Other than living as long as her mother, who died at age 101, as of next Wednesday, the Queen will have met all of the milestones Hartley anticipated. Will she live to celebrate her 101st birthday, on April 21, 2027? (Note that in the text above, which is verbatim from Hartley's book, he misstates the Queen's birthday. She was born on April 21, not April 26.) It's certainly possible and I hope she does. Congratulations, Your Majesty and here's to many, many more years as Queen! 

Saturday, August 29, 2015

This Day In History, 2008: Who The Heck Is Sarah Palin?

Image result for Sarah Palin introduction Aug 2008

It was seven years ago today that Senator John McCain introduced Sarah Palin to the country as his running mate, one of the dumbest (and most disastrous) things a presidential candidate has ever done. How did it happen?

First, some history:
In 1945, President Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage; Vice President Harry Truman became president.

In 1963, President Kennedy was assassinated; Vice President Lyndon Johnson became president.

In 1974, President Nixon resigned after a scandal; Vice President Gerald Ford became president.

That's three times in 70 years. We've also had a few close calls:

In 1975, President Ford was shot at on two separate occasions. If either of the shooters had had steadier hands, Ford could have died and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller would have become president. (Note: this post originally said the assassination attempts were in 1974. It was actually 1975.)

In 1981, President Reagan actually was shot. He survived, but a few millimeters one way or the other could have resulted in a fatal wound and Vice President George H.W. Bush would have become president eight years earlier than he did.

In 1998, President Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives. If the political winds had been blowing differently, he could have been removed from office by the Senate and Vice President Al Gore would have become president.

I provide this short history lesson to make the point that the Vice President matters, whether the president is a 72-year-old cancer survivor, as President McCain would have been, or the youngest elected president, as President Kennedy was. I'm also making the point that putting Sarah Palin on the Republican ticket was a really, really stupid thing to do.

Image result for Sarah Palin introduction Aug 2008

To be clear, I don't believe the McCain campaign knowingly put a blithering idiot on the ticket. Their mistake was selecting someone they knew almost nothing about. (I've read a quote from a senior campaign official who said, and I'm paraphrasing from memory, "We assumed she had the knowledge of an average governor." Wrong. Way, way wrong.) As a woman, I'm particularly insulted by the campaign's belief that just because she was a woman, Palin would attract some of Hillary Clinton's disappointed voters. Even if Palin had turned out to be a lot smarter than she is, there's no way that Hillary's Democratic/liberal/progressive constituency would vote for a candidate with Palin's far-right ideology. And ponder this: there were no women at the highest level of the McCain campaign. If there had been one or more women in the room when the Palin decision was made, would their input have resulted in a different decision? Possibly.

In 2007, Palin entertained top conservative pundits at the governor’s mansion.

So how did this come about, really? As is often the case, there's an intriguing backstory. Writer Jane Mayer tells the whole story in a New Yorker article dated October 27, 2008. You can read it here; this is the good part, starting in the summer of 2007, just a few months after Palin was inaugurated as governor:

Palin was wooing a number of well-connected Washington conservative thinkers. In a stroke of luck, Palin did not have to go to the capital to meet these members of “the permanent political establishment”; they came to Alaska. Shortly after taking office, Palin received two memos from Paulette Simpson, the Alaska Federation of Republican Women leader, noting that two prominent conservative magazines—The Weekly Standard, owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, and National Review, founded by William F. Buckley, Jr.—were planning luxury cruises to Alaska in the summer of 2007, which would make stops in Juneau. Writers and editors from these publications had been enlisted to deliver lectures to politically minded vacationers. “The Governor was more than happy to meet these guys,” Joe Balash, a special staff assistant to Palin, recalled.

Fred Barnes recalled being “struck by how smart Palin was, and how unusually confident. Maybe because she had been a beauty queen, and a star athlete, and succeeded at almost everything she had done.” It didn’t escape his notice, too, that she was “exceptionally pretty.”

By the time the Weekly Standard pundits returned to the cruise ship, Paulette Simpson said, “they were very enamored of her.” 

The other journalists who met Palin offered similarly effusive praise: Michael Gerson called her “a mix between Annie Oakley and Joan of Arc.” The most ardent promoter, however, was Kristol, and his enthusiasm became the talk of Alaska’s political circles. According to Simpson, Senator Stevens told her that “Kristol was really pushing Palin” in Washington before McCain picked her. Indeed, as early as June 29th, two months before McCain chose her, Kristol predicted on “Fox News Sunday” that “McCain’s going to put Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, on the ticket.” He described her as “fantastic,” saying that she could go one-on-one against Obama in basketball, and possibly siphon off Hillary Clinton’s supporters. He pointed out that she was a “mother of five” and a reformer. “Go for the gold here with Sarah Palin,” he said. The moderator, Chris Wallace, finally had to ask Kristol, “Can we please get off Sarah Palin?”

The next day, however, Kristol was still talking about Palin on Fox. “She could be both an effective Vice-Presidential candidate and an effective President,” he said. “She’s young, energetic.” On a subsequent “Fox News Sunday,” Kristol again pushed Palin when asked whom McCain should pick: “Sarah Palin, whom I’ve only met once but I was awfully impressed by—a genuine reformer, defeated the establishment up there. It would be pretty wild to pick a young female Alaska governor, and I think, you know, McCain might as well go for it.” On July 22nd, again on Fox, Kristol referred to Palin as “my heartthrob.” He declared, “I don’t know if I can make it through the next three months without her on the ticket.” 

Jay Nordlinger, a senior editor at National Review, had a more elemental response. In an online column, he described Palin as “a former beauty-pageant contestant, and a real honey, too. Am I allowed to say that? Probably not, but too bad.”

Image result for sarah palin at Belmont

A bunch of (male) conservative writers/pundits went up to Alaska and got distracted by a shiny object in a push-up bra. They made such a fuss about her that she ended up on the Republican ticket without anyone bothering to determine whether she could form a coherent sentence, much less do the job of Vice President. Would any of it have happened if Sarah Palin looked like Madeleine Albright or Janet Reno? If she hadn't been an "exceptionally pretty" beauty queen? A "real honey"? A "babe," as she was described by Rush Limbaugh? No to all of the above. A woman who isn't a "babe" would be laughed out of the room (and possibly off the ticket) after something like this:



Sarah's days as a politician are long over, notwithstanding Donald Trump's suggestion that he would put her in his cabinet. (If you think that's a realistic scenario I have two words for you: Senate Confirmation.) She's still entertaining, however, and this is almost certainly not my last post about her or her family members. Any bets on who's the father of Sarah's soon-to-be third grandchild?